Particulate Versus Cross‐Linked Collagenated Bone Substitutes for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Controlled Trial
There were no significant differences between cross-linked collagenated and particulated DPBMs regarding the dimensional outcomes of horizontal augmentation with the retentive-flap technique. The high resorption rate of the collagenated bone substitute negates its initial superiority in both radiographic and soft tissue dimensions (no. KCT0005348).
Authors
- Ji‐Young Jung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3454-9996)
- Kyung‐A Ko
- Jung‐Seok Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-5978)
- Seung‐Hyun Park (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6207-8036)
- K. Kim
- Dong‐Woon Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0796-9100)
Institutions
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Veterans Health Service Medical Center (KR)
- Wonkwang University (KR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Published
- 2025-03-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14433
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.58