Paradox of Keeping Exotic Animals as Pets

In the European Union (as elsewhere), there are many activities that involve animals and which must, as such, be subject to regulation. These include trade, livestock farming, fishing or for the purpose of environmental protection. Some of these regulations also cover the definition of “pet animals” which includes both domestic and exotic pets- whether from the natural environment (wild animals) or bred in captivity from originally wild animals. Species that have adapted to or undergone a domestication process present a series of characteristics that are more favorable for or conducive to coexistence with humans. This article explores whether exotic species should be viewed as “pets,” based on – by their very nature - being inherently incompatible with domestication, including their habitat/living requirements. In addition, it raises issues around, and rationale or drivers of, the practice of trading and acquiring exotic species as pets, when there is the alternative of keeping a domestic animal for this purpose instead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5848
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradox of Keeping Exotic Animals as Pets

Ngaio Richards, Víctor Briones Dieste, Pedro Brufao Curiel, Rafael Andrés David Fernández et al.
1 citations
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
4.20
article

Paradox of Keeping Exotic Animals as Pets

Ngaio Richards, Víctor Briones Dieste, Pedro Brufao Curiel, Rafael Andrés David Fernández, M. I. San Andrés
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the European Union (as elsewhere), there are many activities that involve animals and which must, as such, be subject to regulation. These include trade, livestock farming, fishing or for the purpose of environmental protection. Some of these regulations also cover the definition of “pet animals” which includes both domestic and exotic pets- whether from the natural environment (wild animals) or bred in captivity from originally wild animals. Species that have adapted to or undergone a domestication process present a series of characteristics that are more favorable for or conducive to coexistence with humans. This article explores whether exotic species should be viewed as “pets,” based on – by their very nature - being inherently incompatible with domestication, including their habitat/living requirements. In addition, it raises issues around, and rationale or drivers of, the practice of trading and acquiring exotic species as pets, when there is the alternative of keeping a domestic animal for this purpose instead.

Studia Ecologiae et BioethicaeVol. 23(2)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Extremadura (ES), Nature Conservation Foundation (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Paradox of Keeping Exotic Animals as Pets — Ngaio Richards, Víctor Briones Dieste, et al. · Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS