Incomes of residents in west European capitals and the immigrants’ settlement pattern

The article studies the relationship between the immigrants’ settlement and the incomes in large European capitals using the examples of London, Madrid and Berlin. Cities were selected based on the importance of the immigration processes, the availability of regional statistical materials and their role in the countries. These cities have attracted large numbers of immigrants, especially in the last 30 years (and earlier in the case of London due to the influx of people from former colonies). The example of housing costs and income distribution shows the socio-ethnic stratification. As a result of the study, cities’ districts were classified based on the immigrants’ percentage, income levels and housing prices, which demonstrated a high degree of territorial mosaic and heterogeneity. For four European capitals, it was shown that a hypothesis of close relationship between the income and migrants microgeography is not always confirmed. The most complicated picture is in London. In Berlin and Madrid, migrant localization sectors are visible, but (not to mention Moscow) it is more difficult to identify their connection with income stratification. A most notable characteristic of the cities studied is the growing immigrants’ numbers and their share in total population, which can reach up to 15–25 %. This fact in itself becomes a significant element of social differentiation. At the same time, immigration in each city has its own characteristics and diversity. Differences between immigrant groups largely determine a degree to which they are isolated or integrated into the city’s social space. London attracts everyone, both rich and poor. Traces of the city’s former partition are still visible in Berlin. In Madrid, there is a concentration of Latin Americans who are culturally similar. And in Moscow, the influx of immigrants often provokes an increase in the cultural distance between them and the locals. A large number and proportion of immigrants, their poor integration into the host society, and inter-ethnic conflicts result in lower tolerance and increasing social and ethnic contrasts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lomonosov Geography Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55959/msu0579-9414.5.80.1.9
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incomes of residents in west European capitals and the immigrants’ settlement pattern

Д. П. Шатило
Lomonosov Geography Journal
Urbanization and City Planning
article

Incomes of residents in west European capitals and the immigrants’ settlement pattern

Д. П. Шатило
article en

Abstract

The article studies the relationship between the immigrants’ settlement and the incomes in large European capitals using the examples of London, Madrid and Berlin. Cities were selected based on the importance of the immigration processes, the availability of regional statistical materials and their role in the countries. These cities have attracted large numbers of immigrants, especially in the last 30 years (and earlier in the case of London due to the influx of people from former colonies). The example of housing costs and income distribution shows the socio-ethnic stratification. As a result of the study, cities’ districts were classified based on the immigrants’ percentage, income levels and housing prices, which demonstrated a high degree of territorial mosaic and heterogeneity. For four European capitals, it was shown that a hypothesis of close relationship between the income and migrants microgeography is not always confirmed. The most complicated picture is in London. In Berlin and Madrid, migrant localization sectors are visible, but (not to mention Moscow) it is more difficult to identify their connection with income stratification. A most notable characteristic of the cities studied is the growing immigrants’ numbers and their share in total population, which can reach up to 15–25 %. This fact in itself becomes a significant element of social differentiation. At the same time, immigration in each city has its own characteristics and diversity. Differences between immigrant groups largely determine a degree to which they are isolated or integrated into the city’s social space. London attracts everyone, both rich and poor. Traces of the city’s former partition are still visible in Berlin. In Madrid, there is a concentration of Latin Americans who are culturally similar. And in Moscow, the influx of immigrants often provokes an increase in the cultural distance between them and the locals. A large number and proportion of immigrants, their poor integration into the host society, and inter-ethnic conflicts result in lower tolerance and increasing social and ethnic contrasts.

Lomonosov Geography JournalVol. 80(№1, 2025)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Urbanization and City Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.