Active Learning Based on Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow in Thoracic Disease Diagnosis

Given the significant advancements in thoracic disease diagnosis due to deep learning, there is a reliance on the availability of numerous annotated samples, which, however, can hardly be guaranteed due to the resource-intensive nature of medical image annotation. Active learning has been introduced to mitigate annotation costs by selecting a subset of uncertain samples for annotation and training. Existing active learning methods encounter two primary challenges: 1) overlooking the impact of samples on the dynamics of model training during data selection, and 2) suffering from high costs of data evaluation and selection. To tackle both issues, we propose a novel metric called Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow (TDGF) for data selection in active learning. Each round of active learning involves three steps: model training, data selection, and data annotation. First, we train a target model, a proxy model, and a historical proxy model on the labeled set. Second, the TDGF scores of unlabeled samples are evaluated based on the surrogate gradient flow, i.e., the TDGF w.r.t the final fully-connected layer between the proxy and historical proxy models, and top-K samples with the highest TDGF scores are selected. Third, the selected samples are annotated, and the labeled pool and unlabeled pool are updated. Comparative experiments have been conducted on two public chest radiograph datasets, i.e., ChestX-ray14 and CheXpert. Our results suggest that the proposed TDGF metric is prone to selecting hard and uncertain samples, and the use of proxy models and surrogate gradient flow substantially reduces the complexity of TDGF calculation. More importantly, the results also indicate that our TDGF-based method outperforms classical and state-of-the-art active learning methods in thoracic disease diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2025.3554298
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Active Learning Based on Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow in Thoracic Disease Diagnosis

Benteng Ma, Hengfei Cui, Yong Xia, Jingfeng Zhang et al.
1 citations
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
1.21
article

Active Learning Based on Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow in Thoracic Disease Diagnosis

Benteng Ma, Hengfei Cui, Yong Xia, Jingfeng Zhang, Jiayi Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Given the significant advancements in thoracic disease diagnosis due to deep learning, there is a reliance on the availability of numerous annotated samples, which, however, can hardly be guaranteed due to the resource-intensive nature of medical image annotation. Active learning has been introduced to mitigate annotation costs by selecting a subset of uncertain samples for annotation and training. Existing active learning methods encounter two primary challenges: 1) overlooking the impact of samples on the dynamics of model training during data selection, and 2) suffering from high costs of data evaluation and selection. To tackle both issues, we propose a novel metric called Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow (TDGF) for data selection in active learning. Each round of active learning involves three steps: model training, data selection, and data annotation. First, we train a target model, a proxy model, and a historical proxy model on the labeled set. Second, the TDGF scores of unlabeled samples are evaluated based on the surrogate gradient flow, i.e., the TDGF w.r.t the final fully-connected layer between the proxy and historical proxy models, and top-K samples with the highest TDGF scores are selected. Third, the selected samples are annotated, and the labeled pool and unlabeled pool are updated. Comparative experiments have been conducted on two public chest radiograph datasets, i.e., ChestX-ray14 and CheXpert. Our results suggest that the proposed TDGF metric is prone to selecting hard and uncertain samples, and the use of proxy models and surrogate gradient flow substantially reduces the complexity of TDGF calculation. More importantly, the results also indicate that our TDGF-based method outperforms classical and state-of-the-art active learning methods in thoracic disease diagnosis.

IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsVol. 29(8)
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Ningbo No. 2 Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.