Emotion and motion: superior memory for emotional but not for moving stimuli

Two effects on memory have been described in the literature: the emotional enhancement of memory (EEM) (i.e., an emotional stimulus is better remembered than a neutral stimulus) and the dynamic superiority effect (DSE) (i.e., a moving visual stimulus is better remembered than a static stimulus). However, the DSE has previously only been studied using complex visual stimuli (e.g., video clips). Thus, the first objective of the present study was to examine whether the DSE will be observed with simple visual stimuli (i.e., isolated moving stimuli). The second objective was to examine whether people's emotional memory will be affected by stimulus motion. We conducted three experiments, two using a free recall task, Experiment 1A (online) and 1B (in-person), and one using a recognition task (in-person). Participants viewed negative, positive, and neutral stimuli in two motion conditions, dynamic and static, and then had to recall or recognize them. In all three experiments, we observed an EEM but no DSE. Thus, our data verify that emotions affect memory performance but provide no evidence of motion effects on memory of simple stimuli.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Research
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02105-4
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotion and motion: superior memory for emotional but not for moving stimuli

Patrick S. R. Davidson, Adam Cox, Hanna Chainay, Isabella Zsoldos et al.
Psychological Research
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Emotion and motion: superior memory for emotional but not for moving stimuli

Patrick S. R. Davidson, Adam Cox, Hanna Chainay, Isabella Zsoldos, Paul Foret-Bruno, Inés Tchekemian Lanaspa
article en

Abstract

Two effects on memory have been described in the literature: the emotional enhancement of memory (EEM) (i.e., an emotional stimulus is better remembered than a neutral stimulus) and the dynamic superiority effect (DSE) (i.e., a moving visual stimulus is better remembered than a static stimulus). However, the DSE has previously only been studied using complex visual stimuli (e.g., video clips). Thus, the first objective of the present study was to examine whether the DSE will be observed with simple visual stimuli (i.e., isolated moving stimuli). The second objective was to examine whether people's emotional memory will be affected by stimulus motion. We conducted three experiments, two using a free recall task, Experiment 1A (online) and 1B (in-person), and one using a recognition task (in-person). Participants viewed negative, positive, and neutral stimuli in two motion conditions, dynamic and static, and then had to recall or recognize them. In all three experiments, we observed an EEM but no DSE. Thus, our data verify that emotions affect memory performance but provide no evidence of motion effects on memory of simple stimuli.

Psychological ResearchVol. 89(2)
University of Ottawa (CA), Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR), Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (FR)
University of Ottawa, Université Lumière Lyon 2
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Emotion and motion: superior memory for emotional but not for moving stimuli — Patrick S. R. Davidson, Adam Cox, et al. · Psychological Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS