Quantification of Steady-State Efficiency Maps vs. Time-Stepping Solutions for Drive Cycle Performance Analysis of Induction Motors

Efficiency analysis of dynamic drive cycles is crucial for evaluating electric vehicle (EV) motors. Conventional steady-state models allow fast development of efficiency maps but can lead to errors in the computation of transient performance due to grid point interpolation and the neglect of transient behavior. Limited understanding exists of the influence of grid coarseness and the error between steady-state and time-stepping solutions. This research aims to quantify these errors for a test-case laboratory-based induction motor (IM) across down-scaled drive cycles, using experimental results as a baseline. This study involves drive cycle performance derived from steady-state efficiency maps developed by finite element analysis (FEA) and direct time-stepping methods, including both analytic and FEA approaches. The results are compared with time-stepping solutions derived from laboratory measurements to identify trade-offs between computational efficiency and accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/icems60997.2024.10921101
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of Steady-State Efficiency Maps vs. Time-Stepping Solutions for Drive Cycle Performance Analysis of Induction Motors

Roland Seebacher, Pawan Kumar Dhakal, Annette Muetze, Kourosh Heidarikani
1 citations
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
0.21
article

Quantification of Steady-State Efficiency Maps vs. Time-Stepping Solutions for Drive Cycle Performance Analysis of Induction Motors

Roland Seebacher, Pawan Kumar Dhakal, Annette Muetze, Kourosh Heidarikani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Efficiency analysis of dynamic drive cycles is crucial for evaluating electric vehicle (EV) motors. Conventional steady-state models allow fast development of efficiency maps but can lead to errors in the computation of transient performance due to grid point interpolation and the neglect of transient behavior. Limited understanding exists of the influence of grid coarseness and the error between steady-state and time-stepping solutions. This research aims to quantify these errors for a test-case laboratory-based induction motor (IM) across down-scaled drive cycles, using experimental results as a baseline. This study involves drive cycle performance derived from steady-state efficiency maps developed by finite element analysis (FEA) and direct time-stepping methods, including both analytic and FEA approaches. The results are compared with time-stepping solutions derived from laboratory measurements to identify trade-offs between computational efficiency and accuracy.

Graz University of Technology (AT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantification of Steady-State Efficiency Maps vs. Time-Stepping Solutions for Drive Cycle Performance Analysis of Induction Motors — Roland Seebacher, Pawan Kumar Dhakal, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS