HETERODOX ECONOMICS: MAIN DIRECTIONS AND PROBLEMS OF RESEARCH

Modern economic theory is represented by two main directions (orthodox and heterodox), fundamentally different approaches to the analysis of market relations. The modern multipolar world is characterized by the absence of linear unidirectional development. The liberal-economic mainstream, which is the basis of market globalization, finds more and more critics in its address. In this regard, the theoretical critique of econometrics is of particular relevance. The aim of the article is to study the main directions of heterodox economics and its critique of the main provisions of econometrics. The objectives of the study are aimed at: studying the main directions of alternative economic theory, finding out the features of each direction of heterodox economics in the context of criticism of liberal economic theory, determining the positive content of alternative economic theory for solving urgent problems of modern economics, analyzing the interaction between the currents of heterodox economics and the prospects of its development. The following directions of alternative economic theory are studied: the new Austrian school, radical political economy, modern institutionalism, post-Keynesianism, traditionalist economics, natural-scientific economics, economic economics, feminist economic theory. It is shown that alternative economics reveals real problems of liberal-market doctrine. At the same time, each current of heterodox economics criticizes not only economics, but also other directions of modern economic theory. Based on this, it is concluded that alternative economics, in general, has a high level of problematic and prioritizes the critical approach. At the same time, each theory develops its own original approach to solving modern economic problems. Within the framework of economics, it is not possible to give a reasoned answer to most of the problems posed by heterodox economics. This indicates the need to create a new economic theory synthesizing orthodox and unorthodox doctrines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical economics
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-12-12-21
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HETERODOX ECONOMICS: MAIN DIRECTIONS AND PROBLEMS OF RESEARCH

Igor' Geraschenko
1 citations
Theoretical economics
Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition
2.23
article

HETERODOX ECONOMICS: MAIN DIRECTIONS AND PROBLEMS OF RESEARCH

Igor' Geraschenko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Modern economic theory is represented by two main directions (orthodox and heterodox), fundamentally different approaches to the analysis of market relations. The modern multipolar world is characterized by the absence of linear unidirectional development. The liberal-economic mainstream, which is the basis of market globalization, finds more and more critics in its address. In this regard, the theoretical critique of econometrics is of particular relevance. The aim of the article is to study the main directions of heterodox economics and its critique of the main provisions of econometrics. The objectives of the study are aimed at: studying the main directions of alternative economic theory, finding out the features of each direction of heterodox economics in the context of criticism of liberal economic theory, determining the positive content of alternative economic theory for solving urgent problems of modern economics, analyzing the interaction between the currents of heterodox economics and the prospects of its development. The following directions of alternative economic theory are studied: the new Austrian school, radical political economy, modern institutionalism, post-Keynesianism, traditionalist economics, natural-scientific economics, economic economics, feminist economic theory. It is shown that alternative economics reveals real problems of liberal-market doctrine. At the same time, each current of heterodox economics criticizes not only economics, but also other directions of modern economic theory. Based on this, it is concluded that alternative economics, in general, has a high level of problematic and prioritizes the critical approach. At the same time, each theory develops its own original approach to solving modern economic problems. Within the framework of economics, it is not possible to give a reasoned answer to most of the problems posed by heterodox economics. This indicates the need to create a new economic theory synthesizing orthodox and unorthodox doctrines.

Theoretical economicsVol. 0(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.