Legal certainty as a condition for the application of regulations on tax benefits (using the example of the IT industry)

Subject. The article examines the challenges of implementing and enforcing industry-specific tax incentives using the example of the IT industry. The specifics of the legal framework governing tax incentives for IT companies, which have undergone significant revisions since 2021, are discussed. Focus is placed on ensuring the availability of instruments providing legal certainty in this area. The purpose of the study. The aim is to identify existing legal issues that limit the application of tax incentives. With regard to the identified gaps in legislation and suboptimal instruments used in establishing IT incentives, measures are proposed to address the situation and increase legal certainty. Methodology. The emphasis is placed on using general scientific methods, such as analysis and synthesis, as well as specific scientific methods like the formal legal method and the method of legal modeling. Conclusions. It is concluded that there are few effective mechanisms in the legislation to address promptly the legal uncertainty arising when implementing tax incentives for IT companies. The legal aspects of the qualification of an IT company established within a group as an artificial structure separated for the purpose of applying tax incentives are discussed. The issue of suboptimal structures for current limitations on income derived from IT activities has been identified, and proposals for resolving this issue have been made, including through improvements to tax legislation. The sections 1 and 2 were contributed by K.A. Ponomareva (section 2 in collaboration with M.A. Golovanev), sections 2-6 by M.A. Golovanev (section 2 in collaboration with K.A. Ponomareva).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Enforcement Review
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(1).24-33
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal certainty as a condition for the application of regulations on tax benefits (using the example of the IT industry)

Karina Ponomareva, M. A. Golovanev
1 citations
Law Enforcement Review
Taxation and Legal Issues
3.91
article

Legal certainty as a condition for the application of regulations on tax benefits (using the example of the IT industry)

Karina Ponomareva, M. A. Golovanev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Subject. The article examines the challenges of implementing and enforcing industry-specific tax incentives using the example of the IT industry. The specifics of the legal framework governing tax incentives for IT companies, which have undergone significant revisions since 2021, are discussed. Focus is placed on ensuring the availability of instruments providing legal certainty in this area. The purpose of the study. The aim is to identify existing legal issues that limit the application of tax incentives. With regard to the identified gaps in legislation and suboptimal instruments used in establishing IT incentives, measures are proposed to address the situation and increase legal certainty. Methodology. The emphasis is placed on using general scientific methods, such as analysis and synthesis, as well as specific scientific methods like the formal legal method and the method of legal modeling. Conclusions. It is concluded that there are few effective mechanisms in the legislation to address promptly the legal uncertainty arising when implementing tax incentives for IT companies. The legal aspects of the qualification of an IT company established within a group as an artificial structure separated for the purpose of applying tax incentives are discussed. The issue of suboptimal structures for current limitations on income derived from IT activities has been identified, and proposals for resolving this issue have been made, including through improvements to tax legislation. The sections 1 and 2 were contributed by K.A. Ponomareva (section 2 in collaboration with M.A. Golovanev), sections 2-6 by M.A. Golovanev (section 2 in collaboration with K.A. Ponomareva).

Law Enforcement ReviewVol. 9(1)
Omsk State University (RU), State Academic University of Humanities (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Taxation and Legal Issues
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.