Rewriting Precedent: How International Adjudicators Influence Compliance

International cooperation depends on adaptation to changing conditions. International dispute settlement bodies can play a key role in maintaining cooperation over time. Evidence suggests that when legal bodies successfully adapt the law through the reinterpretation of rules, they can promote state compliance. However, this process is incremental and may not happen quickly enough, which can lead to backlash against international courts. In this article, we analyze these dynamics at the World Trade Organization (“WTO”), the global institution regulating international trade. Relying on data and case studies, we show how the Appellate Body modified its interpretations to promote compliance. Because this cannot happen in every dispute, the WTO illustrates the tensions between consistency and adaptation legal institutions face.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Michigan Journal of International Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36642/mjil.46.2.rewriting
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rewriting Precedent: How International Adjudicators Influence Compliance

Lauren Peritz, Jeffrey Kucik, Sergio Puig
Michigan Journal of International Law
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Rewriting Precedent: How International Adjudicators Influence Compliance

Lauren Peritz, Jeffrey Kucik, Sergio Puig
article en

Abstract

International cooperation depends on adaptation to changing conditions. International dispute settlement bodies can play a key role in maintaining cooperation over time. Evidence suggests that when legal bodies successfully adapt the law through the reinterpretation of rules, they can promote state compliance. However, this process is incremental and may not happen quickly enough, which can lead to backlash against international courts. In this article, we analyze these dynamics at the World Trade Organization (“WTO”), the global institution regulating international trade. Relying on data and case studies, we show how the Appellate Body modified its interpretations to promote compliance. Because this cannot happen in every dispute, the WTO illustrates the tensions between consistency and adaptation legal institutions face.

Michigan Journal of International Law(46.2)
University of Arizona (US), Rogers (United States) (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.