Using indicators to assess the status of biological invasions and their management on islands─the Prince Edward Islands, South Africa as an example

Abstract Addressing the challenge biological invasions pose to island biodiversity is pivotal to achieving Target 6 of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Using a suite of 24 indicators, we evaluated the current status of biological invasions and their management on the Prince Edward Islands, South Africa’s sub-Antarctic territories, and provide recommendations for management. There are 45 established alien taxa on Marion Island, of which 25 are invasive, and nine invasive taxa on the less frequently visited Prince Edward Island. However, despite stringent biosecurity, new alien taxa continue to arrive, potentially through ten introduction pathways, but particularly as contaminants on goods and stowaways on transport vectors. Not all detected taxa have been systematically recorded or identified—identifying incursions to species level may help pinpoint gaps in biosecurity. Three invasive plant species have caused Major environmental impacts (as per the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa categories), and Massive impacts have been recorded for the house mouse. An ambitious plan to eradicate the house mouse is being developed. A further eight taxa are controlled and four monitored to determine whether they have been eradicated. We argue that systematically tracking and documenting biological invasions is vital to improve the appropriateness, adaptability, and responsiveness of management; and we recommend a dedicated, integrated reporting process involving all stakeholders. Such monitoring is particularly important for remote sites given competing demands to reduce the human footprint, manage biological invasions, and allow access. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Managing biological invasions in protected areas: moving towards the new Global Biodiversity Framework targets’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Invasions
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03463-7
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Polar Research and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using indicators to assess the status of biological invasions and their management on islands─the Prince Edward Islands, South Africa as an example

Katelyn T. Faulkner, Michelle Greve, Laura Fernández Winzer, Peter Christiaan le Roux et al.
6 citations
Biological Invasions
Polar Research and Ecology
10.30
article

Using indicators to assess the status of biological invasions and their management on islands─the Prince Edward Islands, South Africa as an example

Katelyn T. Faulkner, Michelle Greve, Laura Fernández Winzer, Peter Christiaan le Roux, John R. Wilson
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Addressing the challenge biological invasions pose to island biodiversity is pivotal to achieving Target 6 of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Using a suite of 24 indicators, we evaluated the current status of biological invasions and their management on the Prince Edward Islands, South Africa’s sub-Antarctic territories, and provide recommendations for management. There are 45 established alien taxa on Marion Island, of which 25 are invasive, and nine invasive taxa on the less frequently visited Prince Edward Island. However, despite stringent biosecurity, new alien taxa continue to arrive, potentially through ten introduction pathways, but particularly as contaminants on goods and stowaways on transport vectors. Not all detected taxa have been systematically recorded or identified—identifying incursions to species level may help pinpoint gaps in biosecurity. Three invasive plant species have caused Major environmental impacts (as per the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa categories), and Massive impacts have been recorded for the house mouse. An ambitious plan to eradicate the house mouse is being developed. A further eight taxa are controlled and four monitored to determine whether they have been eradicated. We argue that systematically tracking and documenting biological invasions is vital to improve the appropriateness, adaptability, and responsiveness of management; and we recommend a dedicated, integrated reporting process involving all stakeholders. Such monitoring is particularly important for remote sites given competing demands to reduce the human footprint, manage biological invasions, and allow access. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Managing biological invasions in protected areas: moving towards the new Global Biodiversity Framework targets’.

Biological InvasionsVol. 27(4)
Stellenbosch University (ZA), South African National Biodiversity Institute (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Universiteit Stellenbosch
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Polar Research and Ecology
10.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.