Validation of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) Tool in Germany

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The "Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening Tool" (P-CaRES) is used to identify patients with palliative needs in the emergency department. This study aims to translate, adapt, and validate the P-CaRES tool for the German healthcare context. <b>Methods</b>: This is a monocentric, non-interventional, retrospective study conducted in the emergency department of the University Hospital Essen, Germany. After a structured translation process, the tool's face and content validity were evaluated using questionnaires completed by healthcare workers. Construct validity was established by comparing the results with the German-validated Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT). A palliative care physician blinded to the tool, independently assessed the screened patients, and made recommendations on the appropriateness of palliative care referrals. <b>Results</b>: Two hundred eighty-nine emergency department visits were examined. In addition, a total of 26 healthcare professionals were surveyed. 258 screenings were conducted, with P-CaRES identifying 50 positive cases (19.4%). Agreement between SPICT and P-CaRES was 88.4% (kappa: 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.56, 0.78]), showing 64.7% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity. Expert comparison yielded 85.5% agreement (kappa: 0.54, 95% CI: [0.41, 0.68]), with 64.0% sensitivity and 90.8% specificity. Face and content validity showed strong agreement regarding the tool's design, including its comprehensibility, applicability, ease of use, and precision, as well as its usefulness in referring patients to a specialized palliative care team. <b>Conclusions</b>: The study successfully validated a cultural and linguistic equivalent German version of the P-CaRES tool. Further research is necessary to assess the tool's effectiveness in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072191
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) Tool in Germany

María Rosa Salvador Comino, Julia Schmitz, Eva‐Maria Huessler, Joachim Riße et al.
6 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
11.27
article

Validation of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) Tool in Germany

María Rosa Salvador Comino, Julia Schmitz, Eva‐Maria Huessler, Joachim Riße, Mitra Tewes, Bernd Kowall, Clemens Kill, Marie Bubel, Babu P. Mathew
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The "Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening Tool" (P-CaRES) is used to identify patients with palliative needs in the emergency department. This study aims to translate, adapt, and validate the P-CaRES tool for the German healthcare context. <b>Methods</b>: This is a monocentric, non-interventional, retrospective study conducted in the emergency department of the University Hospital Essen, Germany. After a structured translation process, the tool's face and content validity were evaluated using questionnaires completed by healthcare workers. Construct validity was established by comparing the results with the German-validated Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT). A palliative care physician blinded to the tool, independently assessed the screened patients, and made recommendations on the appropriateness of palliative care referrals. <b>Results</b>: Two hundred eighty-nine emergency department visits were examined. In addition, a total of 26 healthcare professionals were surveyed. 258 screenings were conducted, with P-CaRES identifying 50 positive cases (19.4%). Agreement between SPICT and P-CaRES was 88.4% (kappa: 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.56, 0.78]), showing 64.7% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity. Expert comparison yielded 85.5% agreement (kappa: 0.54, 95% CI: [0.41, 0.68]), with 64.0% sensitivity and 90.8% specificity. Face and content validity showed strong agreement regarding the tool's design, including its comprehensibility, applicability, ease of use, and precision, as well as its usefulness in referring patients to a specialized palliative care team. <b>Conclusions</b>: The study successfully validated a cultural and linguistic equivalent German version of the P-CaRES tool. Further research is necessary to assess the tool's effectiveness in clinical practice.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(7)
Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
11.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.