Quantifying surface water evaporation loss rates in the Manas River Basin using stable isotope tracers

ABSTRACT Calculating evaporation loss rates of surface water poses a significant challenge in remote regions, where meteorological data are scarce. To address this challenge, our study has adopted stable isotope tracers to determine the loss rates within the Manas River Basin. Utilizing the stable isotope composition in surface water and precipitation from April to October 2023 in the basin, this study aimed to estimate loss rates using the Craig–Gordon model and the Rayleigh fractionation model across mountainous and plain regions. The local meteoric water line has a smaller slope and intercept than the global meteoric water line, indicating that the precipitation is subjected to strong sub-cloud evaporation. The surface water evaporation line revealed further evaporation after runoff formation, with a decreasing slope from upstream to downstream, indicating increased evaporation loss. We compared the performance of three isotope tracer methods (δ18O, δD, and deuterium excess (d-excess)) for calculating evaporation. In the mountainous region of the watershed, the average evaporation rate per kilometer was 0.023% (δ18O), 0.028% (δD), and 0.030% (d-excess). In contrast, these values were notably elevated in the plain region, reaching 0.106% (δ18O), 0.141% (δD), and 0.117% (d-excess). The Rayleigh fractionation model using d-excess is the most effective among the three evaporation tracing methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology research
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2025.113
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying surface water evaporation loss rates in the Manas River Basin using stable isotope tracers

Hao Tian, Lijun Tian, Guang Yang, Jun Su et al.
1 citations
Hydrology research
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

Quantifying surface water evaporation loss rates in the Manas River Basin using stable isotope tracers

Hao Tian, Lijun Tian, Guang Yang, Jun Su, Yier Dan, Yongbin Li, Jian Qin, Wentao Xu, Wei Chai, Muhammad Arsalan Farid, Yongpeng Tong, Mingda Cui
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Calculating evaporation loss rates of surface water poses a significant challenge in remote regions, where meteorological data are scarce. To address this challenge, our study has adopted stable isotope tracers to determine the loss rates within the Manas River Basin. Utilizing the stable isotope composition in surface water and precipitation from April to October 2023 in the basin, this study aimed to estimate loss rates using the Craig–Gordon model and the Rayleigh fractionation model across mountainous and plain regions. The local meteoric water line has a smaller slope and intercept than the global meteoric water line, indicating that the precipitation is subjected to strong sub-cloud evaporation. The surface water evaporation line revealed further evaporation after runoff formation, with a decreasing slope from upstream to downstream, indicating increased evaporation loss. We compared the performance of three isotope tracer methods (δ18O, δD, and deuterium excess (d-excess)) for calculating evaporation. In the mountainous region of the watershed, the average evaporation rate per kilometer was 0.023% (δ18O), 0.028% (δD), and 0.030% (d-excess). In contrast, these values were notably elevated in the plain region, reaching 0.106% (δ18O), 0.141% (δD), and 0.117% (d-excess). The Rayleigh fractionation model using d-excess is the most effective among the three evaporation tracing methods.

Hydrology researchVol. 56(4)
Shihezi University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (CN), Center for Agricultural Resources Research (CN), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.