The Research Direction of Emerging Human Enhancement Technology from the Perspective of Social Constructivism

Edinburgh School, Bath School, and Paris School are representative schools of social constructivism. The three schools put forward “strong programme,” “empirical programme of relativism,” and “actor-network theory,” respectively. The “strong programme” emphasizes the macro research direction of the relationship between science-technology and society, the “empirical programme of relativism” attaches importance to the micro perspective of science and technology practice itself, and the “actor-network theory” pays attention to such meta issues as the ontology and epistemology of science and technology. The “outside” of technology, the “inside” of technology, and the “net” of technology constitute three directions in which emerging human enhancement technology is to be explored based on social constructivism. From the perspective of the “strong programme,” macro variables such as economy, politics, culture, and society guide the direction of the evolution and development of human enhancement technology; from the perspective of the “empirical programme of relativism,” micro variables such as subject, object, and intermediary of emerging human enhancement technology innovation constitute the internal driving force of its development and progress; from the perspective of the “actor-network theory,” the noumenon of emerging human enhancement technology manifests itself as a “synthesis,” constructed by “actors” and revealed by tracking “actors,” “translation,” and describing ways of interconnection. Integrating sustainability into these perspectives is crucial for ensuring that human enhancement technologies develop in a manner that promotes long-term ecological and social well-being. By aligning macro-level policies and economic incentives with sustainable development goals, fostering eco-friendly innovation practices, and creating inclusive networks that engage diverse stakeholders, these technologies can support human advancement without compromising environmental integrity or social equity. Thus, sustainability becomes a guiding principle that shapes the trajectory of human enhancement technologies, ensuring that they contribute positively to the broader goals of sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies on Religion and Philosophy
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71204/f8jq9n49
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Research Direction of Emerging Human Enhancement Technology from the Perspective of Social Constructivism

Hong Chang
Studies on Religion and Philosophy
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

The Research Direction of Emerging Human Enhancement Technology from the Perspective of Social Constructivism

Hong Chang
article en

Abstract

Edinburgh School, Bath School, and Paris School are representative schools of social constructivism. The three schools put forward “strong programme,” “empirical programme of relativism,” and “actor-network theory,” respectively. The “strong programme” emphasizes the macro research direction of the relationship between science-technology and society, the “empirical programme of relativism” attaches importance to the micro perspective of science and technology practice itself, and the “actor-network theory” pays attention to such meta issues as the ontology and epistemology of science and technology. The “outside” of technology, the “inside” of technology, and the “net” of technology constitute three directions in which emerging human enhancement technology is to be explored based on social constructivism. From the perspective of the “strong programme,” macro variables such as economy, politics, culture, and society guide the direction of the evolution and development of human enhancement technology; from the perspective of the “empirical programme of relativism,” micro variables such as subject, object, and intermediary of emerging human enhancement technology innovation constitute the internal driving force of its development and progress; from the perspective of the “actor-network theory,” the noumenon of emerging human enhancement technology manifests itself as a “synthesis,” constructed by “actors” and revealed by tracking “actors,” “translation,” and describing ways of interconnection. Integrating sustainability into these perspectives is crucial for ensuring that human enhancement technologies develop in a manner that promotes long-term ecological and social well-being. By aligning macro-level policies and economic incentives with sustainable development goals, fostering eco-friendly innovation practices, and creating inclusive networks that engage diverse stakeholders, these technologies can support human advancement without compromising environmental integrity or social equity. Thus, sustainability becomes a guiding principle that shapes the trajectory of human enhancement technologies, ensuring that they contribute positively to the broader goals of sustainable development.

Studies on Religion and PhilosophyVol. 1(1)
Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.