Chipping Away at a Grand Challenge: Aligning Goal and Governance to Reduce Homelessness

When many of today’s deepest problems are intractable, how can public, private, and nonprofit actors collaborate to mitigate negative local effects? Given the open-endedness of any collective effort to “chip away” at a grand challenge, these intersectoral collaborations must align the scope of a shared goal with the governance arrangements distributing decision-making authority. By juxtaposing insights from fieldwork on intersectoral collaborations formed to aid local homeless communities in São Paulo (Brazil), California (USA), and Manchester (UK), this research presents four goal-governance alignments to achieve coordinated collective action. To pursue a targeted goal, an organization can set up or join a local structure of centralised ( Partnerships ) or distributed ( Coalitions ) decision-making authority. To pursue broader goals, an organization can evolve into a Mission by engaging simultaneously in multiple, mutually reinforcing local partnerships and coalitions. Or evolve into a Movement by not only adding local structures of collective action, but also adopting a participation architecture to encourage collaboration at scale from third parties outside the organization’s managerial control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
California Management Review
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256251323533
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chipping Away at a Grand Challenge: Aligning Goal and Governance to Reduce Homelessness

Nuno Gil, Sara Beckman, Felipe Massa, Cristina Sousa et al.
1 citations
California Management Review
Homelessness and Social Issues
2.82
article

Chipping Away at a Grand Challenge: Aligning Goal and Governance to Reduce Homelessness

Nuno Gil, Sara Beckman, Felipe Massa, Cristina Sousa, Özge Kutun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When many of today’s deepest problems are intractable, how can public, private, and nonprofit actors collaborate to mitigate negative local effects? Given the open-endedness of any collective effort to “chip away” at a grand challenge, these intersectoral collaborations must align the scope of a shared goal with the governance arrangements distributing decision-making authority. By juxtaposing insights from fieldwork on intersectoral collaborations formed to aid local homeless communities in São Paulo (Brazil), California (USA), and Manchester (UK), this research presents four goal-governance alignments to achieve coordinated collective action. To pursue a targeted goal, an organization can set up or join a local structure of centralised ( Partnerships ) or distributed ( Coalitions ) decision-making authority. To pursue broader goals, an organization can evolve into a Mission by engaging simultaneously in multiple, mutually reinforcing local partnerships and coalitions. Or evolve into a Movement by not only adding local structures of collective action, but also adopting a participation architecture to encourage collaboration at scale from third parties outside the organization’s managerial control.

California Management ReviewVol. 67(3)
University of Vermont (US), University of Manchester (GB), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Homelessness and Social Issues
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.