Restructuring the Evaluation Framework for Healthcare Professionals’ Communication Skills

This study aims to analyze the communication evaluation criteria outlined in the clinical skills examination guidelines for the National Medical Licensing Examination and to propose a restructured framework centered on communication behaviors to enhance the assessment of communication competencies. The research identifies critical issues in the current symptom-based evaluation framework, including omissions, redundancies, and ambiguities, and reorganizes the evaluation items based on core communication functions. Five key domains—medical history taking, explanation, persuasion, empathy and care, and relationship building—were delineated, with specific items articulated using precise and observable action verbs. The findings of this study provide a practical foundation for the assessment of communication skills in clinical practice examination. Additionally, they offer valuable insights for the development of evaluation tools and educational programs aimed at fostering effective medical communication. Future research should focus on validating the applicability of the proposed framework in clinical contexts and further advancing strategies to improve communication skills training and assessment for medical professionals.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2025.02.16.1.02
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restructuring the Evaluation Framework for Healthcare Professionals’ Communication Skills

Mei Chung, Seunghyun Kim, Jaehyun Park
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Restructuring the Evaluation Framework for Healthcare Professionals’ Communication Skills

Mei Chung, Seunghyun Kim, Jaehyun Park
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the communication evaluation criteria outlined in the clinical skills examination guidelines for the National Medical Licensing Examination and to propose a restructured framework centered on communication behaviors to enhance the assessment of communication competencies. The research identifies critical issues in the current symptom-based evaluation framework, including omissions, redundancies, and ambiguities, and reorganizes the evaluation items based on core communication functions. Five key domains—medical history taking, explanation, persuasion, empathy and care, and relationship building—were delineated, with specific items articulated using precise and observable action verbs. The findings of this study provide a practical foundation for the assessment of communication skills in clinical practice examination. Additionally, they offer valuable insights for the development of evaluation tools and educational programs aimed at fostering effective medical communication. Future research should focus on validating the applicability of the proposed framework in clinical contexts and further advancing strategies to improve communication skills training and assessment for medical professionals.

Vol. 16(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.