Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Handheld Robotic Needle Holder Versus Conventional Instrument in Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Positive Parallel Controlled, and Noninferiority Clinical Trial

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of the HTH-1 handheld robotic needle holder versus conventional instrument in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a noninferiority clinical trial conducted in three hospitals. Patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into the experimental or control group on whom laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed with the ureteral incision sutured using the HTH-1 and conventional needle holder, respectively. The average suture time per stitch (STPS) of ureter was calculated as the primary efficacy indicator. Postoperative drainage volumes were recorded, and the instruments' operating performance was subjectively evaluated and compared between groups. Adverse events occurred during the trial and interference of the instruments to the monitor were assessed as the safety indicators. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From April to September 2018, 50 patients were enrolled with 25 ones in each group. For the efficacy indicators, the noninferiority of the STPS was determined when the noninferiority margin was 40 seconds. The postoperative drainage volumes were not significantly different between groups. The instruments' operating performance was rated as smooth in all cases of both groups. For the safety indicators, no adverse events or interference of the instruments to the monitor occurred during surgery in any case. Clavien 1 complications occurred in 7 (4 in the experimental group versus 3 in the control group, <i>P</i> = 1.000) patients after surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The HTH-1 is effective and safe and noninferior to conventional needle holder in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Adequate training and skills assessment are needed before application on patients. <b><i>Clinical trial registration:</i></b> The clinical trial registration was completed in Jiangsu Provincial Drug Administration (record number: Suxielinbei 20180018).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0394
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Handheld Robotic Needle Holder Versus Conventional Instrument in Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Positive Parallel Controlled, and Noninferiority Clinical Trial

Xinghuan Wang, Yong-Lian Guo, Kun Yang, Zhao-ke Wen et al.
1 citations
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
1.52
article

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Handheld Robotic Needle Holder Versus Conventional Instrument in Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Positive Parallel Controlled, and Noninferiority Clinical Trial

Xinghuan Wang, Yong-Lian Guo, Kun Yang, Zhao-ke Wen, Ziqiang Dong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of the HTH-1 handheld robotic needle holder versus conventional instrument in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a noninferiority clinical trial conducted in three hospitals. Patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into the experimental or control group on whom laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed with the ureteral incision sutured using the HTH-1 and conventional needle holder, respectively. The average suture time per stitch (STPS) of ureter was calculated as the primary efficacy indicator. Postoperative drainage volumes were recorded, and the instruments' operating performance was subjectively evaluated and compared between groups. Adverse events occurred during the trial and interference of the instruments to the monitor were assessed as the safety indicators. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From April to September 2018, 50 patients were enrolled with 25 ones in each group. For the efficacy indicators, the noninferiority of the STPS was determined when the noninferiority margin was 40 seconds. The postoperative drainage volumes were not significantly different between groups. The instruments' operating performance was rated as smooth in all cases of both groups. For the safety indicators, no adverse events or interference of the instruments to the monitor occurred during surgery in any case. Clavien 1 complications occurred in 7 (4 in the experimental group versus 3 in the control group, <i>P</i> = 1.000) patients after surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The HTH-1 is effective and safe and noninferior to conventional needle holder in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Adequate training and skills assessment are needed before application on patients. <b><i>Clinical trial registration:</i></b> The clinical trial registration was completed in Jiangsu Provincial Drug Administration (record number: Suxielinbei 20180018).

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesVol. 35(4)
Wuhan University (CN), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN), Yichang Central People's Hospital (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.