Treatment group-specific inferences in Phase III Randomized Oncology Trials

The majority of published phase III oncology trials present treatment group-specific inferences. However, this inference lacks statistical support, as patients are not randomly sampled from the underlying population, and conflicts with CONSORT guidelines. While ongoing methodological efforts to improve the transportability of treatment group-specific inferences are promising, conventional attempts to generalize treatment-specific outcomes from randomized trials may be misleading. Instead of inference, treatment group-specific outcomes should be described using measures of variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Oncologica
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226x.2025.42663
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment group-specific inferences in Phase III Randomized Oncology Trials

Timothy A. Lin, Alexander D. Sherry, Ethan B. Ludmir, Joseph Abi Jaoude et al.
2 citations
Acta Oncologica
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
5.26
article

Treatment group-specific inferences in Phase III Randomized Oncology Trials

Timothy A. Lin, Alexander D. Sherry, Ethan B. Ludmir, Joseph Abi Jaoude, Ramez Kouzy, Pavlos Msaouel, Adina H. Passy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The majority of published phase III oncology trials present treatment group-specific inferences. However, this inference lacks statistical support, as patients are not randomly sampled from the underlying population, and conflicts with CONSORT guidelines. While ongoing methodological efforts to improve the transportability of treatment group-specific inferences are promising, conventional attempts to generalize treatment-specific outcomes from randomized trials may be misleading. Instead of inference, treatment group-specific outcomes should be described using measures of variability.

Acta OncologicaVol. 64
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
5.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.