Clinical and System-Level Factors Driving Donor Lung Utilization Decisions: A Qualitative Study

<b>Rationale:</b> Key knowledge gaps exist in understanding what drives donor utilization decisions and contributes to the significant variability in organ offer acceptance rates. Defining and addressing the factors that explain variability in organ offer acceptance rates across U.S. transplant centers is a key area of need. <b>Objectives:</b> To identify the clinical and system-level factors that influence donor evaluation and graft acceptance decisions by lung transplant clinicians. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted semistructured interviews with lung transplant clinicians who actively participate in donor evaluation calls and make donor utilization decisions at a U.S. transplant center between December 2022 and September 2023. Interviews were thematically analyzed. <b>Results:</b> From 12 interviews with lung transplant pulmonologists (<i>n</i> = 6) and surgeons(<i>n</i> = 6) across eight different centers, we identified four main themes that represent distinct layers of influence on donor decision-making: <i>1</i>) variability in donor factors considered acceptable for transplant (i.e., donor age, smoking history, oxygenation, imaging) and how to consider donation after cardiac death donor offers; <i>2</i>) the complexity of matching critically ill and difficult-to-match (i.e., highly sensitized, rare blood type) candidates with offered organs; <i>3</i>) the influence of provider training and experience on decision-making; and <i>4</i>) the impact of multiple system factors, including organ allocation, transplant center experience, resources, logistics, donor data availability, donor management strategies, and collaboration with organ procurement organization staff. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings offer insight into clinical practice variability, identify areas that may be improved by policy change, highlight opportunities to improve clinical training, and identify directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202411-1175oc
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and System-Level Factors Driving Donor Lung Utilization Decisions: A Qualitative Study

Edward Cantu, Christian A. Merlo, Jonathan Paul Singer, Emily A. Vail et al.
1 citations
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
2.01
article

Clinical and System-Level Factors Driving Donor Lung Utilization Decisions: A Qualitative Study

Edward Cantu, Christian A. Merlo, Jonathan Paul Singer, Emily A. Vail, Brittany Koons, Matthew Galen Hartwig, Michaela Restivo Anderson, Jason D. Christie, Krishna Pandya, J. Mendez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Key knowledge gaps exist in understanding what drives donor utilization decisions and contributes to the significant variability in organ offer acceptance rates. Defining and addressing the factors that explain variability in organ offer acceptance rates across U.S. transplant centers is a key area of need. <b>Objectives:</b> To identify the clinical and system-level factors that influence donor evaluation and graft acceptance decisions by lung transplant clinicians. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted semistructured interviews with lung transplant clinicians who actively participate in donor evaluation calls and make donor utilization decisions at a U.S. transplant center between December 2022 and September 2023. Interviews were thematically analyzed. <b>Results:</b> From 12 interviews with lung transplant pulmonologists (<i>n</i> = 6) and surgeons(<i>n</i> = 6) across eight different centers, we identified four main themes that represent distinct layers of influence on donor decision-making: <i>1</i>) variability in donor factors considered acceptable for transplant (i.e., donor age, smoking history, oxygenation, imaging) and how to consider donation after cardiac death donor offers; <i>2</i>) the complexity of matching critically ill and difficult-to-match (i.e., highly sensitized, rare blood type) candidates with offered organs; <i>3</i>) the influence of provider training and experience on decision-making; and <i>4</i>) the impact of multiple system factors, including organ allocation, transplant center experience, resources, logistics, donor data availability, donor management strategies, and collaboration with organ procurement organization staff. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings offer insight into clinical practice variability, identify areas that may be improved by policy change, highlight opportunities to improve clinical training, and identify directions for future research.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(8)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of California System (US), Pulmonary and Allergy Associates (US), Duke University Health System (US), Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates (US), Villanova University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.