The participation in cervical cancer screening is not altered by the Hawthorne effect among patients of doctors participating in the randomized clinical trial PaCUDAHL

We carried out an analytical retrospective cohort study involving 332 GPs and their 70,983 female patients, aged 25-65, registered with the Health Insurance Fund of Flanders, using claims database for the three-year periods 2012-2015 and 2016-2019. Statistical analyses were performed using a linear generalized hierarchical mixed model with geographic level as a random effect. The patients of the 24 participating GPs did not have a cervical cancer screening rate different from that of the non-participating GPs, either before recruitment (p = 0.24) or during the PaCUDAHL trial period (p = 0.15). There were significant increases in cervical cancer screening rates over four years regardless of the group considered (p < 0.0001). In conclusion there was no observer effect but a significant cohort effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07186-3
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The participation in cervical cancer screening is not altered by the Hawthorne effect among patients of doctors participating in the randomized clinical trial PaCUDAHL

Alain Duhamel, Michaël Rochoy, Fanny Serman, Axel Descamps et al.
BMC Research Notes
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

The participation in cervical cancer screening is not altered by the Hawthorne effect among patients of doctors participating in the randomized clinical trial PaCUDAHL

Alain Duhamel, Michaël Rochoy, Fanny Serman, Axel Descamps, Christophe Berkhout, Gabrielle Lisembard, François Quersin, Valérie Deken
article en

Abstract

We carried out an analytical retrospective cohort study involving 332 GPs and their 70,983 female patients, aged 25-65, registered with the Health Insurance Fund of Flanders, using claims database for the three-year periods 2012-2015 and 2016-2019. Statistical analyses were performed using a linear generalized hierarchical mixed model with geographic level as a random effect. The patients of the 24 participating GPs did not have a cervical cancer screening rate different from that of the non-participating GPs, either before recruitment (p = 0.24) or during the PaCUDAHL trial period (p = 0.15). There were significant increases in cervical cancer screening rates over four years regardless of the group considered (p < 0.0001). In conclusion there was no observer effect but a significant cohort effect.

BMC Research NotesVol. 18(1)
Université de Lille (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The participation in cervical cancer screening is not altered by the Hawthorne effect among patients of doctors participating in the randomized clinical trial PaCUDAHL — Alain Duhamel, Michaël Rochoy, et al. · BMC Research Notes (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS