Inter-efficacy effects of Velum, Biocult and Nemafric-BL phytonematicide on the suppression of Meloidogyne enterolobii in potato under field conditions

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) does not have genotypes that are resistant to the root-knot (Meloidogyne species) nematodes and thus, were effectively managed using fumigant synthetic chemical nematicides. Since the withdrawal of the products from the agrochemical markets due to their environment-unfriendliness, Meloidogyne enterolobii (Yang and Eisenback) has emerged as a serious threat in crop rotation systems intended to manage this pest. A wide range of alternative products, viewed as being environment-friendly, are being investigated against Meloidogyne species on various crops, but with limited inter-efficacy comparisons. Thus, it was against the stated backdrop that an experiment was carried out to investigate the inter-efficacy comparison of Velum (a.i., fluopyram), Biocult (a.i. Glomus + Trichoderma spp.) and Nemafric-BL phytonematicide (a.i., cucurbitacin B) on the suppression of M. enterolobii in potato under field conditions. The initial nematode population density (Pi) averaged 13 J2/250 ml soil subsample, therefore necessitating augmentation with 100 eggs + J2 M. enterolobii in the furrow with potato tubers, with each treatment applied according to label instruction around randomly selected potato tubers, prior to covering with soil. At harvest, the treatments had significant (P ≤ 0.05) effects on eggs in root, juveniles in root and reproductive potential (RP), contributing 88, 73 and 93% in total treatment variation of the respective variables. Relative to untreated control, Velum reduced eggs in root, juveniles in root and RP by 100 38 and 62%, respectively. Biocult reduced the respective variables by 42, 37 and 71%. Similarly, Nemarioc-BL phytonematicide reduced the respective variables by 67, 70 and 48%. Although inter-efficacy variation in eggs and juveniles in root was significant (P less than 0.05), such variation was not significant on reproductive potential, with all test products significantly reducing nematode variables when compared to untreated control. In conclusion, Velum, Biocult and Nemafric-BL phytonematicide had comparable inter-efficacy effects on the suppression of M. enterolobii in potato and each product could be used in the management of nematode population densities in potato under field conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Crops
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2025.roc-1170
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-efficacy effects of Velum, Biocult and Nemafric-BL phytonematicide on the suppression of Meloidogyne enterolobii in potato under field conditions

P. W. Mashela, K. M. Pofu
Research on Crops
Nematode management and characterization studies
article

Inter-efficacy effects of Velum, Biocult and Nemafric-BL phytonematicide on the suppression of Meloidogyne enterolobii in potato under field conditions

P. W. Mashela, K. M. Pofu
article en

Abstract

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) does not have genotypes that are resistant to the root-knot (Meloidogyne species) nematodes and thus, were effectively managed using fumigant synthetic chemical nematicides. Since the withdrawal of the products from the agrochemical markets due to their environment-unfriendliness, Meloidogyne enterolobii (Yang and Eisenback) has emerged as a serious threat in crop rotation systems intended to manage this pest. A wide range of alternative products, viewed as being environment-friendly, are being investigated against Meloidogyne species on various crops, but with limited inter-efficacy comparisons. Thus, it was against the stated backdrop that an experiment was carried out to investigate the inter-efficacy comparison of Velum (a.i., fluopyram), Biocult (a.i. Glomus + Trichoderma spp.) and Nemafric-BL phytonematicide (a.i., cucurbitacin B) on the suppression of M. enterolobii in potato under field conditions. The initial nematode population density (Pi) averaged 13 J2/250 ml soil subsample, therefore necessitating augmentation with 100 eggs + J2 M. enterolobii in the furrow with potato tubers, with each treatment applied according to label instruction around randomly selected potato tubers, prior to covering with soil. At harvest, the treatments had significant (P ≤ 0.05) effects on eggs in root, juveniles in root and reproductive potential (RP), contributing 88, 73 and 93% in total treatment variation of the respective variables. Relative to untreated control, Velum reduced eggs in root, juveniles in root and RP by 100 38 and 62%, respectively. Biocult reduced the respective variables by 42, 37 and 71%. Similarly, Nemarioc-BL phytonematicide reduced the respective variables by 67, 70 and 48%. Although inter-efficacy variation in eggs and juveniles in root was significant (P less than 0.05), such variation was not significant on reproductive potential, with all test products significantly reducing nematode variables when compared to untreated control. In conclusion, Velum, Biocult and Nemafric-BL phytonematicide had comparable inter-efficacy effects on the suppression of M. enterolobii in potato and each product could be used in the management of nematode population densities in potato under field conditions.

Research on CropsVol. VOLUME 26(ISSUE 1 (MARCH) 2025)
University of Limpopo (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Nematode management and characterization studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.