Guidelines for designing visualization tools for group fairness analysis in binary classification

Abstract The use of machine learning in decision-making has become increasingly pervasive across various fields, from healthcare to finance, enabling systems to learn from data and improve their performance over time. The transformative impact of these new technologies warrants several considerations that demand the development of modern solutions through responsible artificial intelligence—the incorporation of ethical principles into the creation and deployment of AI systems. Fairness is one such principle, ensuring that machine learning algorithms do not produce biased outcomes or discriminate against any group of the population with respect to sensitive attributes, such as race or gender. In this context, visualization techniques can help identify data imbalances and disparities in model performance across different demographic groups. However, there is a lack of guidance towards clear and effective representations that support entry-level users in fairness analysis, particularly when considering that the approaches to fairness visualization can vary significantly. In this regard, the goal of this work is to present a comprehensive analysis of current tools directed at visualizing and examining group fairness in machine learning, with a focus on both data and binary classification model outcomes. These visualization tools are reviewed and discussed, concluding with the proposition of a focused set of visualization guidelines directed towards improving the comprehensibility of fairness visualizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11179-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for designing visualization tools for group fairness analysis in binary classification

Teresa Salazar, Catarina Maç�ãs, Penousal Machado, António Cruz et al.
2 citations
Artificial Intelligence Review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Guidelines for designing visualization tools for group fairness analysis in binary classification

Teresa Salazar, Catarina Maç�ãs, Penousal Machado, António Cruz, Pedro Henriques Abreu, Manuel Carvalho
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The use of machine learning in decision-making has become increasingly pervasive across various fields, from healthcare to finance, enabling systems to learn from data and improve their performance over time. The transformative impact of these new technologies warrants several considerations that demand the development of modern solutions through responsible artificial intelligence—the incorporation of ethical principles into the creation and deployment of AI systems. Fairness is one such principle, ensuring that machine learning algorithms do not produce biased outcomes or discriminate against any group of the population with respect to sensitive attributes, such as race or gender. In this context, visualization techniques can help identify data imbalances and disparities in model performance across different demographic groups. However, there is a lack of guidance towards clear and effective representations that support entry-level users in fairness analysis, particularly when considering that the approaches to fairness visualization can vary significantly. In this regard, the goal of this work is to present a comprehensive analysis of current tools directed at visualizing and examining group fairness in machine learning, with a focus on both data and binary classification model outcomes. These visualization tools are reviewed and discussed, concluding with the proposition of a focused set of visualization guidelines directed towards improving the comprehensibility of fairness visualizations.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 58(6)
Centro de Neurociências e Biologia Celular (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Universidade de Coimbra
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.