Measuring appreciation made EA-SI-the development of a short scale to measure experienced appreciation in social interactions at work

Experienced appreciation at work is incongruently defined and measured in the scientific literature. Therefore, this article aims to give an overview of different definitions and measures of experienced appreciation at work to clarify the confusing state of research. Then, the new construct, Experienced Appreciation in Social Interactions (EA-SI) at Work, is introduced to counter the incongruency in defining experienced appreciation at work and to provide a reliable and comparable operationalization of the construct. In a second step, the article aims to develop and validate a short scale to measure EA-SI more time-efficiently. To do so, the instrument is derived from the original EA-SI Work Scale considering confirmatory factor analyses, artificial intelligence, and the evaluation of naïve and expert judges based on a sample of <i>N</i> = 391 employees. Subsequently, the EA-SI Work Scale (short) - including <i>k</i> = 4 items each for colleagues and supervisors as a source of experienced appreciation - is validated in a second independent sample with <i>N</i> = 323 participants. The assumptions of its theoretical framework (the Stress as Offense to Self-theory) and the relations between EA-SI and employee work engagement and burnout were tested to validate the short scale. Additionally, its internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity were determined. Social support was added as a control variable to test for EA-SI's incremental predictive value. The results highlight the unidimensional structure of EA-SI and point toward high reliability and validity of the short scale. Conclusively, the limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1465512
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring appreciation made EA-SI-the development of a short scale to measure experienced appreciation in social interactions at work

Martin Resch, Henrik Bellhäuser, Elena Nagelmann
1 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
article

Measuring appreciation made EA-SI-the development of a short scale to measure experienced appreciation in social interactions at work

Martin Resch, Henrik Bellhäuser, Elena Nagelmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Experienced appreciation at work is incongruently defined and measured in the scientific literature. Therefore, this article aims to give an overview of different definitions and measures of experienced appreciation at work to clarify the confusing state of research. Then, the new construct, Experienced Appreciation in Social Interactions (EA-SI) at Work, is introduced to counter the incongruency in defining experienced appreciation at work and to provide a reliable and comparable operationalization of the construct. In a second step, the article aims to develop and validate a short scale to measure EA-SI more time-efficiently. To do so, the instrument is derived from the original EA-SI Work Scale considering confirmatory factor analyses, artificial intelligence, and the evaluation of naïve and expert judges based on a sample of <i>N</i> = 391 employees. Subsequently, the EA-SI Work Scale (short) - including <i>k</i> = 4 items each for colleagues and supervisors as a source of experienced appreciation - is validated in a second independent sample with <i>N</i> = 323 participants. The assumptions of its theoretical framework (the Stress as Offense to Self-theory) and the relations between EA-SI and employee work engagement and burnout were tested to validate the short scale. Additionally, its internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity were determined. Social support was added as a control variable to test for EA-SI's incremental predictive value. The results highlight the unidimensional structure of EA-SI and point toward high reliability and validity of the short scale. Conclusively, the limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.