Dual Evaluation Indicators for Sustainable Suppliers

This study establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating sustainability by integrating radar chart analysis with fuzzy linguistic methods, helping enterprises select suppliers that align with sustainable development principles. Testing within the textile industry confirmed the framework’s reliability, effectively identifying strengths and areas for improvement across key sustainability dimensions: environmental, social, economic, and governance. The analysis highlighted strong supplier performance in governance and social responsibility, particularly in human rights protection, while emphasizing the need for improvements in environmental aspects such as water resource management and product recycling. Economic factors, including product quality and delivery capability, demonstrated significant potential, though cost efficiency remained a challenge. Recommendations focus on enhancing board diversity, employee satisfaction, and circular economy initiatives. The framework demonstrates strong applicability within the textile industry and has the potential for adaptation in other sectors. Future research should conduct industry-specific validations to refine weight allocation for dynamic markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072816
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual Evaluation Indicators for Sustainable Suppliers

Yung‐Hsiang Hung, Wen-Pai Wang
Sustainability
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Dual Evaluation Indicators for Sustainable Suppliers

Yung‐Hsiang Hung, Wen-Pai Wang
article en

Abstract

This study establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating sustainability by integrating radar chart analysis with fuzzy linguistic methods, helping enterprises select suppliers that align with sustainable development principles. Testing within the textile industry confirmed the framework’s reliability, effectively identifying strengths and areas for improvement across key sustainability dimensions: environmental, social, economic, and governance. The analysis highlighted strong supplier performance in governance and social responsibility, particularly in human rights protection, while emphasizing the need for improvements in environmental aspects such as water resource management and product recycling. Economic factors, including product quality and delivery capability, demonstrated significant potential, though cost efficiency remained a challenge. Recommendations focus on enhancing board diversity, employee satisfaction, and circular economy initiatives. The framework demonstrates strong applicability within the textile industry and has the potential for adaptation in other sectors. Future research should conduct industry-specific validations to refine weight allocation for dynamic markets.

SustainabilityVol. 17(7)
National Chin-Yi University of Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dual Evaluation Indicators for Sustainable Suppliers — Yung‐Hsiang Hung, Wen-Pai Wang · Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS