Improving soil moisture prediction using Gaussian process regression

• Three ML models were developed to predict soil moisture using data from multiple growing seasons. • All models performed better in predicting moisture in subsoils than in topsoil. • Gaussian process regression (GPR) outperformed other ML models at all depths. • GPR with automatic relevant determination kernels had the best performance with R 2 > 0.95. Soil moisture plays a vital role in agriculture and hydrology, influencing key processes like plant growth and evaporation. Recent advancements in soil moisture monitoring have improved our ability to measure it at different scales, but challenges persist at intermediate scales that are crucial for precision agriculture. To address this research gap, innovative methods like machine learning (ML) are being explored to improve prediction accuracy, overcoming the limitations of traditional models. By leveraging an extensive dataset that spans multiple sites and seasons, we aim to improve predictions for both surface and root zone soil moisture. In this study, machine learning models including multilinear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and Gaussian process regression (GPR), were developed and compared for soil moisture predictions at different depths at 29 weather stations in the Red River Valley using features such as time, locations, meteorological data, soil physical properties, and remote sensing data. Our research showed that GPR with automatic relevant determination kernels had the best performance with R 2 values greater than 0.95 at almost all depths when including all features. GPR ( R 2 =0.95–0.99, RMSE=0.0045–0.0224, MAE=0.0012–0.0139) outperformed MLR ( R 2 =0.69–0.93, RMSE=0.0328–0.0555, MAE=0.0197–0.0427) and SVM ( R 2 =0.49–0.85, RMSE=0.0648–0.0747, MAE=0.0442–0.0566) for soil moisture prediction. All models performed better when predicting moisture in subsoils (20–100 cm) than in topsoil (0–10 cm). Our research highlights the effectiveness of GPR as a powerful ML tool that enhances soil moisture management precision, ultimately contributing to more effective and smart agricultural practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100905
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving soil moisture prediction using Gaussian process regression

Xiaomo Zhang, Xin Sun, Zhulu Lin
7 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
5.59
article

Improving soil moisture prediction using Gaussian process regression

Xiaomo Zhang, Xin Sun, Zhulu Lin
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• Three ML models were developed to predict soil moisture using data from multiple growing seasons. • All models performed better in predicting moisture in subsoils than in topsoil. • Gaussian process regression (GPR) outperformed other ML models at all depths. • GPR with automatic relevant determination kernels had the best performance with R 2 > 0.95. Soil moisture plays a vital role in agriculture and hydrology, influencing key processes like plant growth and evaporation. Recent advancements in soil moisture monitoring have improved our ability to measure it at different scales, but challenges persist at intermediate scales that are crucial for precision agriculture. To address this research gap, innovative methods like machine learning (ML) are being explored to improve prediction accuracy, overcoming the limitations of traditional models. By leveraging an extensive dataset that spans multiple sites and seasons, we aim to improve predictions for both surface and root zone soil moisture. In this study, machine learning models including multilinear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and Gaussian process regression (GPR), were developed and compared for soil moisture predictions at different depths at 29 weather stations in the Red River Valley using features such as time, locations, meteorological data, soil physical properties, and remote sensing data. Our research showed that GPR with automatic relevant determination kernels had the best performance with R 2 values greater than 0.95 at almost all depths when including all features. GPR ( R 2 =0.95–0.99, RMSE=0.0045–0.0224, MAE=0.0012–0.0139) outperformed MLR ( R 2 =0.69–0.93, RMSE=0.0328–0.0555, MAE=0.0197–0.0427) and SVM ( R 2 =0.49–0.85, RMSE=0.0648–0.0747, MAE=0.0442–0.0566) for soil moisture prediction. All models performed better when predicting moisture in subsoils (20–100 cm) than in topsoil (0–10 cm). Our research highlights the effectiveness of GPR as a powerful ML tool that enhances soil moisture management precision, ultimately contributing to more effective and smart agricultural practices.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 11
North Dakota State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.