Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of various calculation formulas and measurement systems for the target astigmatic axis of the toric IOL in intraocular correction of corneal astigmatism

Background. The effectiveness intraocular correction of corneal astigmatism on the target astigmatic axis in the online calculators toric IOL. The aim. To establish the effectiveness of corneal astigmatism correction by toric IOLs calculated by various methods of astigmatic axis measurement. Material and methods. Forty patients (60 eyes) with corneal astigmatism were analyzed. Keratometry parameters for calculations in 30 eyes were obtained using Wave Light Oculyzer II or Pentacam HR, the measurement of the toric astigmatic axis was carried out using the Kane formula. In 30 eyes, keratometric data for calculation were obtained using the Verion Measurement Module, the target axis was calculated using the Barett formula in Verion. Results. Statistically significantly lower vector and centroid error was shown by calculations of the target astigmatic axis using the Kane formula with Oculyzer II or Pentacam HR keratometry compared with the results of calculations with kerat ometry and Barett in Verion (p < 0.05). The smallest centroid (0.05 dpt) and the smallest average absolute error (0.47 ± 0.51 dpt) of the residual astigmatism indicators in the Kane calculation group, the arithmetic difference of the calculated target axes of the toric orientation according to Verion and Kane revealed, in 70 % of the calculations of the second group, a difference of more than 5° in measuring the axis orientation. The percentage of eyes with a vector error of less than 0.5 dpt in the second group exceeded the indicator of the first group by 13.3 %, less than 1.0 dpt – by 23.3 %. Conclusion. The calculation of the toric axis according to online formula using Oculyzer II or Pentacam HR keratometric indicators allows us to obtain a smaller average centroid error of 0.05 dpt compared with a centroid error of 0.25 with the orien tation of the toric axis according to keratometric measurements on Verion and the calculation on Verion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Biomedica Scientifica (East Siberian Biomedical Journal)
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29413/abs.2025-10.1.21
Primary Topic
Optical Systems and Laser Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of various calculation formulas and measurement systems for the target astigmatic axis of the toric IOL in intraocular correction of corneal astigmatism

E. V. Leksutkina, A. I. Fisenko, E.V. Kozina, O. S. Nabatova
Acta Biomedica Scientifica (East Siberian Biomedical Journal)
Optical Systems and Laser Technology
article

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of various calculation formulas and measurement systems for the target astigmatic axis of the toric IOL in intraocular correction of corneal astigmatism

E. V. Leksutkina, A. I. Fisenko, E.V. Kozina, O. S. Nabatova
article en

Abstract

Background. The effectiveness intraocular correction of corneal astigmatism on the target astigmatic axis in the online calculators toric IOL. The aim. To establish the effectiveness of corneal astigmatism correction by toric IOLs calculated by various methods of astigmatic axis measurement. Material and methods. Forty patients (60 eyes) with corneal astigmatism were analyzed. Keratometry parameters for calculations in 30 eyes were obtained using Wave Light Oculyzer II or Pentacam HR, the measurement of the toric astigmatic axis was carried out using the Kane formula. In 30 eyes, keratometric data for calculation were obtained using the Verion Measurement Module, the target axis was calculated using the Barett formula in Verion. Results. Statistically significantly lower vector and centroid error was shown by calculations of the target astigmatic axis using the Kane formula with Oculyzer II or Pentacam HR keratometry compared with the results of calculations with kerat ometry and Barett in Verion (p < 0.05). The smallest centroid (0.05 dpt) and the smallest average absolute error (0.47 ± 0.51 dpt) of the residual astigmatism indicators in the Kane calculation group, the arithmetic difference of the calculated target axes of the toric orientation according to Verion and Kane revealed, in 70 % of the calculations of the second group, a difference of more than 5° in measuring the axis orientation. The percentage of eyes with a vector error of less than 0.5 dpt in the second group exceeded the indicator of the first group by 13.3 %, less than 1.0 dpt – by 23.3 %. Conclusion. The calculation of the toric axis according to online formula using Oculyzer II or Pentacam HR keratometric indicators allows us to obtain a smaller average centroid error of 0.05 dpt compared with a centroid error of 0.25 with the orien tation of the toric axis according to keratometric measurements on Verion and the calculation on Verion.

Acta Biomedica Scientifica (East Siberian Biomedical Journal)Vol. 10(1)
Intersectoral Research and Technology Complex Eye Microsurgery (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Optical Systems and Laser Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.