Beyond the First Generation of Wind Modeling for Resource Assessment and Siting: From Meteorology to Uncertainty Quantification

Increasingly large turbines have led to a transition from surface-based ‘bottom–up’ wind flow modeling and meteorological understanding, to more complex modeling of wind resources, energy yields, and site assessment. More expensive turbines, larger windfarms, and maturing commercialization have meant that uncertainty quantification (UQ) of such modeling has become crucial for the wind industry. In this paper, we outline the meteorological roots of wind modeling and why it was initially possible, advancing to the more complex models needed for large wind turbines today, and the tradeoffs and implications of using such models. Statistical implications of how data are averaged and/or split in various resource assessment methodologies are also examined, and requirements for validation of classic and complex models are considered. Uncertainty quantification is outlined, and its current practice on the ‘wind’ side of the industry is discussed, including the emerging standard for such. Demonstrative examples are given for uncertainty propagation and multi-project performance versus uncertainty, with a final reminder about the distinction between UQ and risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071589
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the First Generation of Wind Modeling for Resource Assessment and Siting: From Meteorology to Uncertainty Quantification

Mark Kelly
2 citations
Energies
Wind and Air Flow Studies
1.60
article

Beyond the First Generation of Wind Modeling for Resource Assessment and Siting: From Meteorology to Uncertainty Quantification

Mark Kelly
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Increasingly large turbines have led to a transition from surface-based ‘bottom–up’ wind flow modeling and meteorological understanding, to more complex modeling of wind resources, energy yields, and site assessment. More expensive turbines, larger windfarms, and maturing commercialization have meant that uncertainty quantification (UQ) of such modeling has become crucial for the wind industry. In this paper, we outline the meteorological roots of wind modeling and why it was initially possible, advancing to the more complex models needed for large wind turbines today, and the tradeoffs and implications of using such models. Statistical implications of how data are averaged and/or split in various resource assessment methodologies are also examined, and requirements for validation of classic and complex models are considered. Uncertainty quantification is outlined, and its current practice on the ‘wind’ side of the industry is discussed, including the emerging standard for such. Demonstrative examples are given for uncertainty propagation and multi-project performance versus uncertainty, with a final reminder about the distinction between UQ and risk.

EnergiesVol. 18(7)
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond the First Generation of Wind Modeling for Resource Assessment and Siting: From Meteorology to Uncertainty Quantification — Mark Kelly · Energies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS