Perbandingan Perlindungan Konsumen Aplikasi Open Banking di Indonesia dan Malaysia

This research aims to find out how the relevant regulations and governments in Indonesia and Malaysia work to protect consumers of open banking applications. The type of research used is normative legal research, prescriptive and applied in nature using deductive syllogism reasoning method analysis. The approach used is a statutory approach (statue approach) and comparative approach with primary legal materials including various types of laws and regulations regarding consumer protection in Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as secondary legal materials including books, journal articles, and official documents. The results show that there are differences in consumer protection in Indonesia and Malaysia which are analyzed through 4 (four) indicators, namely consumer protection regulations, consumer protection law enforcement agencies, consumer dispute resolution mechanisms, and open banking supervisory institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jembatan Hukum
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1321
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perbandingan Perlindungan Konsumen Aplikasi Open Banking di Indonesia dan Malaysia

Gessica Aulya Rahmy Dias, Purwono Sungkowo Raharjo, Sapto Hermawan
Jembatan Hukum
Islamic Finance and Communication
article

Perbandingan Perlindungan Konsumen Aplikasi Open Banking di Indonesia dan Malaysia

Gessica Aulya Rahmy Dias, Purwono Sungkowo Raharjo, Sapto Hermawan
article en

Abstract

This research aims to find out how the relevant regulations and governments in Indonesia and Malaysia work to protect consumers of open banking applications. The type of research used is normative legal research, prescriptive and applied in nature using deductive syllogism reasoning method analysis. The approach used is a statutory approach (statue approach) and comparative approach with primary legal materials including various types of laws and regulations regarding consumer protection in Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as secondary legal materials including books, journal articles, and official documents. The results show that there are differences in consumer protection in Indonesia and Malaysia which are analyzed through 4 (four) indicators, namely consumer protection regulations, consumer protection law enforcement agencies, consumer dispute resolution mechanisms, and open banking supervisory institutions.

Jembatan HukumVol. 2(1)
Sebelas Maret University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Islamic Finance and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.