Impact of intervention strategies on listeriosis risk in cooked ham: Biopreservation and high pressure processing

Biopreservation and post-lethality treatments (PLT) are the basis of operating procedures applied to reduce the levels of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat food. The combination of these strategies must be wisely selected, and their interaction should be considered in quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA) assessing the listeriosis risk. The aim of the present study was to develop a QMRA model to assess the impact of intervention strategies, including formulation with lactate, bioprotective cultures and the use of high-pressure processing (HPP), on reducing the listeriosis risk associated to the consumption of cooked meat products by elderly populations. Particularly, the interaction between the formulation with lactate and the application of HPP was addressed as lactate is reported to exert (i) a piezo-protection on L. monocytogenes inactivation by HPP and (ii) a piezo-stimulation effect on the growth rate of survivors. Results showed that the reduction of product's shelf-life or the use of biopreservation strategies (lactate and bioprotective cultures) were more effective in reducing the listeriosis risk than mild HPP treatments. Moreover, the application of a mild HPP treatment in combination with the formulation with lactate did not result in a higher risk reduction compared to the formulation of lactate alone. On the other hand, the application of a 5-log PLT was more effective for risk reduction compared to other strategies. The results provided in this work can help in the design of measures to control L. monocytogenes that have the desired impact on risk of reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2025.111174
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Microbial Inactivation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of intervention strategies on listeriosis risk in cooked ham: Biopreservation and high pressure processing

Roland Lindqvist, Sara Bover‐Cid, Anna Jofré, Cristina Serra-Castelló
2 citations
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Microbial Inactivation Methods
2.47
article

Impact of intervention strategies on listeriosis risk in cooked ham: Biopreservation and high pressure processing

Roland Lindqvist, Sara Bover‐Cid, Anna Jofré, Cristina Serra-Castelló
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Biopreservation and post-lethality treatments (PLT) are the basis of operating procedures applied to reduce the levels of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat food. The combination of these strategies must be wisely selected, and their interaction should be considered in quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA) assessing the listeriosis risk. The aim of the present study was to develop a QMRA model to assess the impact of intervention strategies, including formulation with lactate, bioprotective cultures and the use of high-pressure processing (HPP), on reducing the listeriosis risk associated to the consumption of cooked meat products by elderly populations. Particularly, the interaction between the formulation with lactate and the application of HPP was addressed as lactate is reported to exert (i) a piezo-protection on L. monocytogenes inactivation by HPP and (ii) a piezo-stimulation effect on the growth rate of survivors. Results showed that the reduction of product's shelf-life or the use of biopreservation strategies (lactate and bioprotective cultures) were more effective in reducing the listeriosis risk than mild HPP treatments. Moreover, the application of a mild HPP treatment in combination with the formulation with lactate did not result in a higher risk reduction compared to the formulation of lactate alone. On the other hand, the application of a 5-log PLT was more effective for risk reduction compared to other strategies. The results provided in this work can help in the design of measures to control L. monocytogenes that have the desired impact on risk of reduction.

International Journal of Food MicrobiologyVol. 435
National Food Administration (SE), Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Microbial Inactivation Methods
2.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.