Uncovering the Hidden Curriculum in Generative AI: A Reflective Technology Audit for Teacher Educators

In this article, we explore the concept of a “hidden curriculum” within generative AI, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), and its intersection with the hidden curriculum in education. We highlight how AI, trained on biased human data, can perpetuate societal inequities and discriminatory practices despite appearing objective. We present a technology audit that examines how LLMs score and provide feedback on student writing samples paired with student descriptions. Findings reveal that LLMs exhibit implicit biases, such as assigning lower scores when students are said to attend an “inner-city school” or prefer rap music. In addition, the feedback text given to passages said to be written by Black and Hispanic students displayed higher levels of clout or authority, mirroring and legitimizing power dynamics of schooling. We conclude by discussing implications of these findings for teacher education, policy, and research, emphasizing the need to address AI’s hidden curriculum to avoid perpetuating educational inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Teacher Education
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871251325073
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering the Hidden Curriculum in Generative AI: A Reflective Technology Audit for Teacher Educators

Marie K. Heath, Melissa Warr
9 citations
Journal of Teacher Education
Online Learning and Analytics
15.24
article

Uncovering the Hidden Curriculum in Generative AI: A Reflective Technology Audit for Teacher Educators

Marie K. Heath, Melissa Warr
article en
9 citations

Abstract

In this article, we explore the concept of a “hidden curriculum” within generative AI, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), and its intersection with the hidden curriculum in education. We highlight how AI, trained on biased human data, can perpetuate societal inequities and discriminatory practices despite appearing objective. We present a technology audit that examines how LLMs score and provide feedback on student writing samples paired with student descriptions. Findings reveal that LLMs exhibit implicit biases, such as assigning lower scores when students are said to attend an “inner-city school” or prefer rap music. In addition, the feedback text given to passages said to be written by Black and Hispanic students displayed higher levels of clout or authority, mirroring and legitimizing power dynamics of schooling. We conclude by discussing implications of these findings for teacher education, policy, and research, emphasizing the need to address AI’s hidden curriculum to avoid perpetuating educational inequality.

Journal of Teacher EducationVol. 76(3)
New Mexico State University (US), Loyola University Maryland (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Online Learning and Analytics
15.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.