Design, Modeling, and Comprehensive Analysis for The Wing of an Aircraft

This study examines the design and analysis of a training aircraft wing. The methodology includes aerodynamic and stress analyses. Microsoft Excel is utilized for scaling. Aerodynamic forces, load distribution, and air foil comparison computations were performed by Xflr 5. Inventor was used for stress analysis, which yielded wing deflections, Von Mises stresses, and safety factors. AutoCAD was employed to draw wing parts. The proper design for the cross-sectional shape of the inner wing components was determined. The goal is to find the lightest cross-section, the placements and numbers of wing ribs, and calculate the wing's dimensions. The findings revealed that wing tip deflection did not exceed 0.02. The von Mises calculations also show that the chosen material meets the requisite safety factor. For I and U sections, the deflection, von Mises stresses, and safety factor were 46.52mm and 43.27mm, 219.3 MPa and 152.7MPa, and 1.25 and 1.8, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NTU Journal of Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56286/txv7rh29
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design, Modeling, and Comprehensive Analysis for The Wing of an Aircraft

Mohammed Najeeb Abdullah, Hakam Waadallah Shehab, Mohammed Saleh Mohammed
2 citations
NTU Journal of Engineering and Technology
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
2.21
article

Design, Modeling, and Comprehensive Analysis for The Wing of an Aircraft

Mohammed Najeeb Abdullah, Hakam Waadallah Shehab, Mohammed Saleh Mohammed
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examines the design and analysis of a training aircraft wing. The methodology includes aerodynamic and stress analyses. Microsoft Excel is utilized for scaling. Aerodynamic forces, load distribution, and air foil comparison computations were performed by Xflr 5. Inventor was used for stress analysis, which yielded wing deflections, Von Mises stresses, and safety factors. AutoCAD was employed to draw wing parts. The proper design for the cross-sectional shape of the inner wing components was determined. The goal is to find the lightest cross-section, the placements and numbers of wing ribs, and calculate the wing's dimensions. The findings revealed that wing tip deflection did not exceed 0.02. The von Mises calculations also show that the chosen material meets the requisite safety factor. For I and U sections, the deflection, von Mises stresses, and safety factor were 46.52mm and 43.27mm, 219.3 MPa and 152.7MPa, and 1.25 and 1.8, respectively.

NTU Journal of Engineering and TechnologyVol. 4(1)
University of Mosul (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.