The E-Learning in University Studies: A Scientific and Social Analysis

The aim of this study is to validate the use of e-learning as a learning methodology after the urgent need generated by the pandemic. A comparative analysis is carried out between scientific studies on the subject and social listening to contrast whether e-learning is still a reality today. We start by analysing the scientific activity in the Wos database through a bibliometric study, from which we extract a systemic review and a meta-analysis from 2019 to the present day. The PRISMA statement focuses this analysis on 50 articles from 26 sources from a total of 192 authors. Subsequently, through artificial intelligence and social network listening, we find out what is being said about e-learning. By analysing and comparing the scientific and social results, conclusions are reached that shed light on the current challenges of using e-learning systems in higher education. Despite the fact that e-learning should remain a learning style parallel to higher education, as demonstrated by the positive experiences of university students, teachers and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, currently research on the subject and mentions in networks show that this learning system has not followed an adequate development on an educational level. The rapid growth of e-learning during the pandemic has been relegated to a mere mirage, which we think should continue to grow in the near future.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v31i1.9535
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The E-Learning in University Studies: A Scientific and Social Analysis

Ángel Bartolomé Muñoz de Luna
Online and Blended Learning
article

The E-Learning in University Studies: A Scientific and Social Analysis

Ángel Bartolomé Muñoz de Luna
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to validate the use of e-learning as a learning methodology after the urgent need generated by the pandemic. A comparative analysis is carried out between scientific studies on the subject and social listening to contrast whether e-learning is still a reality today. We start by analysing the scientific activity in the Wos database through a bibliometric study, from which we extract a systemic review and a meta-analysis from 2019 to the present day. The PRISMA statement focuses this analysis on 50 articles from 26 sources from a total of 192 authors. Subsequently, through artificial intelligence and social network listening, we find out what is being said about e-learning. By analysing and comparing the scientific and social results, conclusions are reached that shed light on the current challenges of using e-learning systems in higher education. Despite the fact that e-learning should remain a learning style parallel to higher education, as demonstrated by the positive experiences of university students, teachers and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, currently research on the subject and mentions in networks show that this learning system has not followed an adequate development on an educational level. The rapid growth of e-learning during the pandemic has been relegated to a mere mirage, which we think should continue to grow in the near future.

Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.