Soil resource acquisition strategy modulates global plant nutrient and water economics

Natural selection favors growth by selecting a combination of plant traits that maximize photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation at the lowest combined carbon costs of resource acquisition and use. We quantified how soil nutrient availability, plant nutrient acquisition strategies, and aridity modulate the variability in plant costs of nutrient acquisition relative to water acquisition (β). We used an eco-evolutionary optimality framework and a global carbon isotope dataset to quantify β. Under low soil nitrogen-to-carbon (N : C) ratios, a mining strategy (symbioses with ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi) reduced β by mining organic nitrogen, compared with a scavenging strategy (symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi). Conversely, under high N : C ratios, scavenging strategies reduced β by effectively scavenging soluble nitrogen, compared with mining strategies. N<sub>2</sub>-fixing plants did not exhibit reduced β under low N : C ratios compared with non-N<sub>2</sub>-fixing plants. Moisture increased β only in plants using a scavenging strategy, reflecting direct impacts of aridity on the carbon costs of maintaining transpiration in these plants. Nitrogen and phosphorus colimitation further modulated β. Our findings provide a framework for simulating the variability of plant economics due to plant nutrient acquisition strategies in earth system models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70087
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil resource acquisition strategy modulates global plant nutrient and water economics

Nicholas G. Smith, Alissar Cheaïb, Jeff Chieppa, Evan A. Perkowski
9 citations
New Phytologist
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
9.95
article

Soil resource acquisition strategy modulates global plant nutrient and water economics

Nicholas G. Smith, Alissar Cheaïb, Jeff Chieppa, Evan A. Perkowski
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Natural selection favors growth by selecting a combination of plant traits that maximize photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation at the lowest combined carbon costs of resource acquisition and use. We quantified how soil nutrient availability, plant nutrient acquisition strategies, and aridity modulate the variability in plant costs of nutrient acquisition relative to water acquisition (β). We used an eco-evolutionary optimality framework and a global carbon isotope dataset to quantify β. Under low soil nitrogen-to-carbon (N : C) ratios, a mining strategy (symbioses with ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi) reduced β by mining organic nitrogen, compared with a scavenging strategy (symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi). Conversely, under high N : C ratios, scavenging strategies reduced β by effectively scavenging soluble nitrogen, compared with mining strategies. N<sub>2</sub>-fixing plants did not exhibit reduced β under low N : C ratios compared with non-N<sub>2</sub>-fixing plants. Moisture increased β only in plants using a scavenging strategy, reflecting direct impacts of aridity on the carbon costs of maintaining transpiration in these plants. Nitrogen and phosphorus colimitation further modulated β. Our findings provide a framework for simulating the variability of plant economics due to plant nutrient acquisition strategies in earth system models.

New PhytologistVol. 246(4)
Texas Tech University (US)
National Science Foundation
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
9.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.