Differentiation, Integration, and Control Dynamics in Multidisciplinary Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Northern Italian Public Addiction Services

This ethnographic study explores the complex dynamics of differentiation and integration within multidisciplinary teams in Northern Italian Public Services for Addictions. This study investigates the challenges arising from ambiguous role boundaries and overlapping functions as well as the control mechanisms that maintain system equilibrium. Through participant observation and semistructured interviews with 28 professionals from three addiction services, this study reveals a nuanced interplay among professional roles, team structures, and organizational control. The findings highlight the varying degrees of formalization among specialized subsystems, leading to overlapping responsibilities and blurred boundaries that impact professional recognition and identity. Three distinct levels of control were identified: hierarchical, horizontal, and decision-making control at the collegial team level. These control mechanisms, coupled with various sanctioning strategies, play a crucial role in enforcing adherence to organizational norms. The microteam structure emerges as a fundamental unit of control, shaping role expectations and behavioral norms through continuous social interaction. This study underscores the importance of balancing differentiation and integration as well as the critical role of control mechanisms in maintaining system functionality. These findings have implications for policymaking, service quality improvement, and enhancement of multidisciplinary approaches to address addiction-related challenges in healthcare system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Social Science
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244251325146
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiation, Integration, and Control Dynamics in Multidisciplinary Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Northern Italian Public Addiction Services

Barbara Menara
1 citations
Journal of Applied Social Science
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
article

Differentiation, Integration, and Control Dynamics in Multidisciplinary Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Northern Italian Public Addiction Services

Barbara Menara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This ethnographic study explores the complex dynamics of differentiation and integration within multidisciplinary teams in Northern Italian Public Services for Addictions. This study investigates the challenges arising from ambiguous role boundaries and overlapping functions as well as the control mechanisms that maintain system equilibrium. Through participant observation and semistructured interviews with 28 professionals from three addiction services, this study reveals a nuanced interplay among professional roles, team structures, and organizational control. The findings highlight the varying degrees of formalization among specialized subsystems, leading to overlapping responsibilities and blurred boundaries that impact professional recognition and identity. Three distinct levels of control were identified: hierarchical, horizontal, and decision-making control at the collegial team level. These control mechanisms, coupled with various sanctioning strategies, play a crucial role in enforcing adherence to organizational norms. The microteam structure emerges as a fundamental unit of control, shaping role expectations and behavioral norms through continuous social interaction. This study underscores the importance of balancing differentiation and integration as well as the critical role of control mechanisms in maintaining system functionality. These findings have implications for policymaking, service quality improvement, and enhancement of multidisciplinary approaches to address addiction-related challenges in healthcare system.

Journal of Applied Social ScienceVol. 19(2)
University of Worcester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.