Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Computed Tomography Procedures Using Dose Management Software: A Comparison with Manual Methods

Background: Medical imaging radiation dose records are important for the process of optimising patient imaging in radiography. Understanding and monitoring the ionizing radiation doses delivered to patients while carrying out an imaging protocol is essential if that imaging protocol is to be adjusted with the goal of achieving a clinically acceptable result while reducing the radiation dose delivered to patients. Dose management software (DMS) systems are now available for use in conjunction with picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). They facilitate the collection and analysis of Digital Imaging and COmmunications in Medicine (DICOM) standard radiation dose structured reports (RDSRs). Implementation of DMS systems allows for the routine establishment of local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for defined clinical imaging protocols in medical imaging including for computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopic, and general radiographic modalities.Materials and Methods: Implementation of a DMS was recently completed in a Local Health District in New South Wales in conjunction with a PACS upgrade across the district. LDRLs obtained using this DMS have been assessed and compared to the manual methods used for compiling contributions to nationwide surveys carried out by the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) to establish national LDRLs for a range of CT imaging protocols.Results and Discussion: The mean difference between the dose metrics determined for LDRLs using manually generated and comprehensive DMS samples was 6.9% when using volumetric computed tomography dose index as dose metric, and 6% when using dose length product as the dose metric.Conclusion: Results of the comparison show that a DMS can readily replace manual surveys conducted previously, and RDSRs allow greater opportunity to better understand the factors impacting the doses delivered during CT procedures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2024.00178
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Computed Tomography Procedures Using Dose Management Software: A Comparison with Manual Methods

William Rae, R.M. Rasheed
1 links
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Computed Tomography Procedures Using Dose Management Software: A Comparison with Manual Methods

William Rae, R.M. Rasheed
article en

Abstract

Background: Medical imaging radiation dose records are important for the process of optimising patient imaging in radiography. Understanding and monitoring the ionizing radiation doses delivered to patients while carrying out an imaging protocol is essential if that imaging protocol is to be adjusted with the goal of achieving a clinically acceptable result while reducing the radiation dose delivered to patients. Dose management software (DMS) systems are now available for use in conjunction with picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). They facilitate the collection and analysis of Digital Imaging and COmmunications in Medicine (DICOM) standard radiation dose structured reports (RDSRs). Implementation of DMS systems allows for the routine establishment of local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for defined clinical imaging protocols in medical imaging including for computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopic, and general radiographic modalities.Materials and Methods: Implementation of a DMS was recently completed in a Local Health District in New South Wales in conjunction with a PACS upgrade across the district. LDRLs obtained using this DMS have been assessed and compared to the manual methods used for compiling contributions to nationwide surveys carried out by the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) to establish national LDRLs for a range of CT imaging protocols.Results and Discussion: The mean difference between the dose metrics determined for LDRLs using manually generated and comprehensive DMS samples was 6.9% when using volumetric computed tomography dose index as dose metric, and 6% when using dose length product as the dose metric.Conclusion: Results of the comparison show that a DMS can readily replace manual surveys conducted previously, and RDSRs allow greater opportunity to better understand the factors impacting the doses delivered during CT procedures.

Journal of Radiation Protection and ResearchVol. 50(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.