A Relational Approach to Coalitions: Pragmatic and Communal Interracial Coalitions

ABSTRACT The United States is a diverse, multiethnic country, where there are many examples of different racial and ethnic minority groups working together for myriad causes. What predicts the emergence, maintenance, and dissolution of interracial coalitions? Ample research establishes perceptions of shared interest as crucial to coalition‐relevant outcomes, yet this work often takes a unidirectional approach—assessing perceptions of how one's ingroup relates to an outgroup, or how outgroups are perceived to relate to the ingroup. By contrast, this review takes a relational approach—considering how groups assess the bidirectional relationship with one another to effectively coordinate towards shared goals. Drawing from the interpersonal relations literature, we posit that interracial coalitions can be pragmatic or communal based on relational norms. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of the novel framework and recommendations for individuals seeking interracial support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Issues and Policy Review
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.70001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Relational Approach to Coalitions: Pragmatic and Communal Interracial Coalitions

Maureen A. Craig, Ilayda Orhan
2 citations
Social Issues and Policy Review
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
article

A Relational Approach to Coalitions: Pragmatic and Communal Interracial Coalitions

Maureen A. Craig, Ilayda Orhan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The United States is a diverse, multiethnic country, where there are many examples of different racial and ethnic minority groups working together for myriad causes. What predicts the emergence, maintenance, and dissolution of interracial coalitions? Ample research establishes perceptions of shared interest as crucial to coalition‐relevant outcomes, yet this work often takes a unidirectional approach—assessing perceptions of how one's ingroup relates to an outgroup, or how outgroups are perceived to relate to the ingroup. By contrast, this review takes a relational approach—considering how groups assess the bidirectional relationship with one another to effectively coordinate towards shared goals. Drawing from the interpersonal relations literature, we posit that interracial coalitions can be pragmatic or communal based on relational norms. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of the novel framework and recommendations for individuals seeking interracial support.

Social Issues and Policy ReviewVol. 19(1)
Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.