A syntactic account of auxiliary selection in French

Abstract This article presents a modern theoretical approach to auxiliary selection in Standard European French. Assuming that have and be are allomorphs spelling out the functional head v Aux , it argues that the person feature identity of v Aux plays a central role in determining auxiliary choice: be is inserted when T and v Aux share the same person feature identity, and when identity differs, have obtains. Crucially, and unlike most analyses in the literature, this simple proposal provides a unified account of auxiliary selection for unaccusatives, transitives, and reflexive verbs. It explains why reflexive transitives pattern with unaccusatives, and as a result, the analysis challenges the view that auxiliary selection is sensitive to argument structure. A key assumption here is that have functions as the elsewhere auxiliary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Probus
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2024-0005
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A syntactic account of auxiliary selection in French

Marc Olivier
Probus
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

A syntactic account of auxiliary selection in French

Marc Olivier
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a modern theoretical approach to auxiliary selection in Standard European French. Assuming that have and be are allomorphs spelling out the functional head v Aux , it argues that the person feature identity of v Aux plays a central role in determining auxiliary choice: be is inserted when T and v Aux share the same person feature identity, and when identity differs, have obtains. Crucially, and unlike most analyses in the literature, this simple proposal provides a unified account of auxiliary selection for unaccusatives, transitives, and reflexive verbs. It explains why reflexive transitives pattern with unaccusatives, and as a result, the analysis challenges the view that auxiliary selection is sensitive to argument structure. A key assumption here is that have functions as the elsewhere auxiliary.

ProbusVol. 37(2)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.