Problems and Improvements in the School Violence Review Committee

After the revision of the School Violence Prevention Act, the autonomy committee established in schools was changed to a review committee established in the Education Support Agency. This study analyzed the problems of the changed council and explored ways to improve it. To this end, focus group interviews(FGIs) were conducted with deliberative council members in Busan and Gyeongnam and analyzed. The results of the study reiterated the problems of the autonomous council, which include the bias and unprofessionalism of parent members, formalized operation, passive action against victimized students, and inconsistent action against perpetrators. New problems were identified, such as passive response by the school, transfer to the investigator, concealment and reduction of private schools, delayed deliberations, appointment of the chairperson in favor of the principal, abuse of the role of the secretary, inducing the chairperson to take action, and biased reappointment. Recommendations for improvement included reducing the number of parent members through legislative amendments, improving the reappointment process, reviewing the criteria for taking action against offending students, and improving the selection method for chairpersons.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Research Institute
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34245/jed.44.3.729
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problems and Improvements in the School Violence Review Committee

Youngchul Ryu
Educational Research Institute
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Problems and Improvements in the School Violence Review Committee

Youngchul Ryu
article en

Abstract

After the revision of the School Violence Prevention Act, the autonomy committee established in schools was changed to a review committee established in the Education Support Agency. This study analyzed the problems of the changed council and explored ways to improve it. To this end, focus group interviews(FGIs) were conducted with deliberative council members in Busan and Gyeongnam and analyzed. The results of the study reiterated the problems of the autonomous council, which include the bias and unprofessionalism of parent members, formalized operation, passive action against victimized students, and inconsistent action against perpetrators. New problems were identified, such as passive response by the school, transfer to the investigator, concealment and reduction of private schools, delayed deliberations, appointment of the chairperson in favor of the principal, abuse of the role of the secretary, inducing the chairperson to take action, and biased reappointment. Recommendations for improvement included reducing the number of parent members through legislative amendments, improving the reappointment process, reviewing the criteria for taking action against offending students, and improving the selection method for chairpersons.

Educational Research InstituteVol. 44(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.