Capturing the disruptive nature of green energy transitions: A political economy approach

This paper seeks to develop a new analytical framework for understanding the disruptive dynamics of green energy transitions. While the empirical reality of such disruptions is widely recognised, the only literature within which disruption has been explicitly conceptualised is that arising within the socio-technical transitions research tradition through the notion of “disruptive innovation.” We argue that this approach, centred on technological innovations by firms that disrupt existing markets, consumers, and regulatory arrangements, is too narrow to capture the full range of disruptive dynamics associated with green energy transitions and that a framework rooted in critical political economy approaches is needed to do so. After surveying the various literatures that demonstrate this full range of disruptive dynamics, we propose a definition of disruption and an analytical framework that can both capture the existing empirical research on such disruptions and generate future research. Our analysis reveals that the disruptions associated with GETS are not merely by-products of the transition process but are central to the way these transitions unfold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104039
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing the disruptive nature of green energy transitions: A political economy approach

Pritish Behuria, Matthew Paterson, Sandra Jazmin Barragán-Contreras, Silke Trommer et al.
4 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
article

Capturing the disruptive nature of green energy transitions: A political economy approach

Pritish Behuria, Matthew Paterson, Sandra Jazmin Barragán-Contreras, Silke Trommer, Sam Hickey, James H. Jackson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper seeks to develop a new analytical framework for understanding the disruptive dynamics of green energy transitions. While the empirical reality of such disruptions is widely recognised, the only literature within which disruption has been explicitly conceptualised is that arising within the socio-technical transitions research tradition through the notion of “disruptive innovation.” We argue that this approach, centred on technological innovations by firms that disrupt existing markets, consumers, and regulatory arrangements, is too narrow to capture the full range of disruptive dynamics associated with green energy transitions and that a framework rooted in critical political economy approaches is needed to do so. After surveying the various literatures that demonstrate this full range of disruptive dynamics, we propose a definition of disruption and an analytical framework that can both capture the existing empirical research on such disruptions and generate future research. Our analysis reveals that the disruptions associated with GETS are not merely by-products of the transition process but are central to the way these transitions unfold.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 123
University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Capturing the disruptive nature of green energy transitions: A political economy approach — Pritish Behuria, Matthew Paterson, et al. · Energy Research & Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS