<scp>Understanding</scp> the challenge of developing pedagogical reasoning in initial teacher education: Theorising as practice‐focused research

Abstract In this paper, we theorise our practice as teacher educators to understand a practice issue: the challenge our students had in developing pedagogical reasoning. The article discusses the findings of the theorising process to explore how pedagogical reasoning is developed and why it is challenging. It also provides an approach for theorising and exemplifies the process. We first explain our practice issue before outlining a framework for theorising adapted from the work of Stepney and Thomson, and Coghlan and Rigg. The approach involved abductive reasoning through reflexive conversations and written accounts of practice in relation to the findings of an integrative literature review, our personal practical theories and our earlier research into the practice issue. Theorising led us to understand pedagogical reasoning as a complex process emerging from the integration of different forms of knowledge across Initial Teacher Education programmes. This integration depends on the formation of epistemic relations and requires an explicit intellectual endeavour between students and teacher educators. We explore how we might encourage this endeavour through the ideas of intellectual space, epistemic coherence and slow pedagogy. We also make the case for theorising to be considered as a form of practice‐focused research and hope to encourage others to engage with its transformative potential for understanding persistent practice issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4167
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the challenge of developing pedagogical reasoning in initial teacher education: Theorising as practice‐focused research

Fiona Patrick, David W. Love
1 links
British Educational Research Journal
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Understanding the challenge of developing pedagogical reasoning in initial teacher education: Theorising as practice‐focused research

Fiona Patrick, David W. Love
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we theorise our practice as teacher educators to understand a practice issue: the challenge our students had in developing pedagogical reasoning. The article discusses the findings of the theorising process to explore how pedagogical reasoning is developed and why it is challenging. It also provides an approach for theorising and exemplifies the process. We first explain our practice issue before outlining a framework for theorising adapted from the work of Stepney and Thomson, and Coghlan and Rigg. The approach involved abductive reasoning through reflexive conversations and written accounts of practice in relation to the findings of an integrative literature review, our personal practical theories and our earlier research into the practice issue. Theorising led us to understand pedagogical reasoning as a complex process emerging from the integration of different forms of knowledge across Initial Teacher Education programmes. This integration depends on the formation of epistemic relations and requires an explicit intellectual endeavour between students and teacher educators. We explore how we might encourage this endeavour through the ideas of intellectual space, epistemic coherence and slow pedagogy. We also make the case for theorising to be considered as a form of practice‐focused research and hope to encourage others to engage with its transformative potential for understanding persistent practice issues.

British Educational Research JournalVol. 51(4)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.