An expert system to quantify wildfire hazards in gardens and create effective defensible space

Wildfires are causing increased house loss worldwide, especially at the wildland-urban interface. Despite the existing plethora of guidelines to help creating defensible space in a garden and protect houses from wildfire, quantifying risk remains a research frontier. We designed an assessment method based on a recent global review of defensible space guidelines and identified hazards based on fuel type, amount, and spatial arrangement. We trialled the assessment in 32 gardens located in southern Tasmania (Australia). We combined survey data using an expert system enabling calculation of hazard scores that accounts for the interaction between fuel characteristics and used sensitivity analysis to rank individual hazards based on their impact on hazard score. Gardens included a high number of plant taxa (N = 374), 72 % of which were exotic to Australia. The most common hazards were represented by material objects close to the house, as well as plant cover, garden vertical structure, and flammability of plants across the whole defensible space. Most gardens achieved an overall ‘Moderate’ (N = 15) or ‘High’ (N = 13) hazard score, with only two classified as ‘Low’ and one as ‘Very High’. Sensitivity analysis identified vegetation characteristics – cover, location, and watering status – as well as the presence of fire-protective elements as the individual variables with the highest impact on overall hazard score. The proposed method quantifies fire hazards within gardens, provides flexible solutions to support guideline implementation, and facilitates comparisons across different geographic settings. • Creating defensible space in a garden can mitigate wildfire house loss risk. • We designed a novel method to comprehensively assess fire hazards in gardens. • We trialled the method in 32 gardens in southern Tasmania (Australia). • Vegetation characteristics and fire-protective elements ranked highest. • The assessment delivers personalised guidelines to provide flexible solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105424
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An expert system to quantify wildfire hazards in gardens and create effective defensible space

Scott M. Foyster, Grant J. Williamson, David M. J. S. Bowman, Stefania Ondei
3 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Fire effects on ecosystems
3.32
article

An expert system to quantify wildfire hazards in gardens and create effective defensible space

Scott M. Foyster, Grant J. Williamson, David M. J. S. Bowman, Stefania Ondei
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Wildfires are causing increased house loss worldwide, especially at the wildland-urban interface. Despite the existing plethora of guidelines to help creating defensible space in a garden and protect houses from wildfire, quantifying risk remains a research frontier. We designed an assessment method based on a recent global review of defensible space guidelines and identified hazards based on fuel type, amount, and spatial arrangement. We trialled the assessment in 32 gardens located in southern Tasmania (Australia). We combined survey data using an expert system enabling calculation of hazard scores that accounts for the interaction between fuel characteristics and used sensitivity analysis to rank individual hazards based on their impact on hazard score. Gardens included a high number of plant taxa (N = 374), 72 % of which were exotic to Australia. The most common hazards were represented by material objects close to the house, as well as plant cover, garden vertical structure, and flammability of plants across the whole defensible space. Most gardens achieved an overall ‘Moderate’ (N = 15) or ‘High’ (N = 13) hazard score, with only two classified as ‘Low’ and one as ‘Very High’. Sensitivity analysis identified vegetation characteristics – cover, location, and watering status – as well as the presence of fire-protective elements as the individual variables with the highest impact on overall hazard score. The proposed method quantifies fire hazards within gardens, provides flexible solutions to support guideline implementation, and facilitates comparisons across different geographic settings. • Creating defensible space in a garden can mitigate wildfire house loss risk. • We designed a novel method to comprehensively assess fire hazards in gardens. • We trialled the method in 32 gardens in southern Tasmania (Australia). • Vegetation characteristics and fire-protective elements ranked highest. • The assessment delivers personalised guidelines to provide flexible solutions.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 121
University of Tasmania (AU), MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Fire effects on ecosystems
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.