Assessing cropping system effects on carbon footprint on the Canadian prairies

Abstract Crop rotations are considered a promising strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and enhancing soil organic matter in agricultural land. However, studies often focused solely on either GHG emissions or soil organic carbon (SOC) changes, rather than integrating both indicators. We conducted a 4‐year (2018–2021) crop rotation study to examine effects of six rotation systems in three ecoregions (sub‐humid, sub‐semiarid, and semiarid) on GHG emissions, SOC changes, and C footprints in Saskatchewan, Canada. The six rotation systems include (i) control, (ii) intensified, (iii) diversified, (iv) market‐driven, (v) high‐risk, and (vi) soil‐health cropping system. GHG emissions were estimated using the Holos model, and SOC changes were estimated using the Campbell model, and C footprints were calculated as the difference between GHG emissions and SOC changes. The 4‐year cumulative GHG emissions, expressed as CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 e), were highest in the sub‐humid ecoregion due to higher background SOC levels, nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs, and precipitation. The diversified and soil‐health systems reduced GHG emissions by reduced N fertilizer inputs. Carbon footprints revealed net CO 2 e emissions for the market‐driven system but net CO 2 e withdrawals for the soil‐health and diversified systems. The results indicated that the diversified systems significantly mitigated GHG emissions, increased soil C stocks, and withdrew CO 2 e.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70039
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing cropping system effects on carbon footprint on the Canadian prairies

Sisi Lin, Kui Liu, Reynald Lemke
4 citations
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
4.74
article

Assessing cropping system effects on carbon footprint on the Canadian prairies

Sisi Lin, Kui Liu, Reynald Lemke
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Crop rotations are considered a promising strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and enhancing soil organic matter in agricultural land. However, studies often focused solely on either GHG emissions or soil organic carbon (SOC) changes, rather than integrating both indicators. We conducted a 4‐year (2018–2021) crop rotation study to examine effects of six rotation systems in three ecoregions (sub‐humid, sub‐semiarid, and semiarid) on GHG emissions, SOC changes, and C footprints in Saskatchewan, Canada. The six rotation systems include (i) control, (ii) intensified, (iii) diversified, (iv) market‐driven, (v) high‐risk, and (vi) soil‐health cropping system. GHG emissions were estimated using the Holos model, and SOC changes were estimated using the Campbell model, and C footprints were calculated as the difference between GHG emissions and SOC changes. The 4‐year cumulative GHG emissions, expressed as CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 e), were highest in the sub‐humid ecoregion due to higher background SOC levels, nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs, and precipitation. The diversified and soil‐health systems reduced GHG emissions by reduced N fertilizer inputs. Carbon footprints revealed net CO 2 e emissions for the market‐driven system but net CO 2 e withdrawals for the soil‐health and diversified systems. The results indicated that the diversified systems significantly mitigated GHG emissions, increased soil C stocks, and withdrew CO 2 e.

Soil Science Society of America JournalVol. 89(2)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Western Grains Research Foundation, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
4.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.