Data fusion: creating new opportunities for data analysis? A study on the potential of data fusion in survey research

Abstract Primary data collection has become increasingly challenging. There are many reasons for this: Not only has the cost of conducting face-to-face interviews increased and the number of available interviewers decreased, but the ongoing shift to web-based interviewing has resulted in shorter questionnaires, making it difficult to accurately measure latent constructs and cover a wide range of topics. Therefore, despite the advantage of conducting primary data collection to match one's research questions, secondary data analysis is often more feasible. For this purpose, data archives such as the Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives (CESSDA) provide a large amount of high-quality data. However, a common problem when working with secondary data is that important variables are missing in one dataset and are only available in another. We propose a possible solution to overcome this problem by using "data fusion", which allows to augment one dataset by including the missing variables that are initially only available in another dataset. From a statistical point of view, this corresponds to a missing value problem, which is why multiple imputation is often used to fuse datasets. Despite this promising idea, data fusion is only sporadically applied in the social sciences. This paper discusses the potential of this statistical technique in the context of social science research and derives a guide for practitioners interested in applying the method to their own research. The method and potential are discussed via an example using data from the European Social Survey (ESS) and the Austrian Social Survey (ASS).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality & Quantity
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02107-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data fusion: creating new opportunities for data analysis? A study on the potential of data fusion in survey research

Dimitri Prandner, Johann Bacher, Roman Pfeiler
1 citations
Quality & Quantity
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
4.20
article

Data fusion: creating new opportunities for data analysis? A study on the potential of data fusion in survey research

Dimitri Prandner, Johann Bacher, Roman Pfeiler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Primary data collection has become increasingly challenging. There are many reasons for this: Not only has the cost of conducting face-to-face interviews increased and the number of available interviewers decreased, but the ongoing shift to web-based interviewing has resulted in shorter questionnaires, making it difficult to accurately measure latent constructs and cover a wide range of topics. Therefore, despite the advantage of conducting primary data collection to match one's research questions, secondary data analysis is often more feasible. For this purpose, data archives such as the Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives (CESSDA) provide a large amount of high-quality data. However, a common problem when working with secondary data is that important variables are missing in one dataset and are only available in another. We propose a possible solution to overcome this problem by using "data fusion", which allows to augment one dataset by including the missing variables that are initially only available in another dataset. From a statistical point of view, this corresponds to a missing value problem, which is why multiple imputation is often used to fuse datasets. Despite this promising idea, data fusion is only sporadically applied in the social sciences. This paper discusses the potential of this statistical technique in the context of social science research and derives a guide for practitioners interested in applying the method to their own research. The method and potential are discussed via an example using data from the European Social Survey (ESS) and the Austrian Social Survey (ASS).

Quality & QuantityVol. 59(4)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data fusion: creating new opportunities for data analysis? A study on the potential of data fusion in survey research — Dimitri Prandner, Johann Bacher, et al. · Quality & Quantity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS