A Comparative Analysis of Agency Monitoring Cost and Financial Performance of Financial and Non-Financial Companies in Nigeria

Corporate governance is vital for transparency, accountability, and efficiency in organizational management. A key aspect of corporate governance is agency monitoring, which entails costs incurred to oversee managerial actions and align them with shareholders' interests. However, the impact of agency monitoring expenses on financial performance varies across sectors. Financial institutions, subject to strict regulatory oversight, require intensive monitoring, whereas non-financial firms may experience less scrutiny. Understanding these differences is crucial for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers aiming to enhance financial performance while maintaining strong governance. This study employs a correlational research design to examine the relationship between agency monitoring cost and financial performance in listed financial and non-financial firms in Nigeria. Based on market capitalization, the analysis covers 20 firms—10 financial and 10 non-financial—selected from 157 companies listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX) between 2011 and 2020. Data were sourced from the firms' annual reports and analyzed using panel regression estimates. Findings indicate that agency monitoring costs significantly enhance financial performance in financial firms, while their impact on non-financial firms is minimal. These results align with agency theory, which stresses the necessity of stringent oversight to mitigate managerial opportunism. The study underscores the sectorial differences in agency monitoring effectiveness and recommends that financial institutions prioritize monitoring expenses to improve governance and performance by strategically investing in efficient oversight mechanisms that align managerial actions with shareholder interests. These insights contribute to corporate governance literature and provide practical guidance for firms seeking to balance monitoring costs with financial efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FUDMA Journal of Accounting and Finance Research [FUJAFR]
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33003/fujafr-2025.v3i1.162.65-78
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Agency Monitoring Cost and Financial Performance of Financial and Non-Financial Companies in Nigeria

Teryima Samuel Orshi, Patrick Orbanga Awuhe
FUDMA Journal of Accounting and Finance Research [FUJAFR]
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
article

A Comparative Analysis of Agency Monitoring Cost and Financial Performance of Financial and Non-Financial Companies in Nigeria

Teryima Samuel Orshi, Patrick Orbanga Awuhe
article en

Abstract

Corporate governance is vital for transparency, accountability, and efficiency in organizational management. A key aspect of corporate governance is agency monitoring, which entails costs incurred to oversee managerial actions and align them with shareholders' interests. However, the impact of agency monitoring expenses on financial performance varies across sectors. Financial institutions, subject to strict regulatory oversight, require intensive monitoring, whereas non-financial firms may experience less scrutiny. Understanding these differences is crucial for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers aiming to enhance financial performance while maintaining strong governance. This study employs a correlational research design to examine the relationship between agency monitoring cost and financial performance in listed financial and non-financial firms in Nigeria. Based on market capitalization, the analysis covers 20 firms—10 financial and 10 non-financial—selected from 157 companies listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX) between 2011 and 2020. Data were sourced from the firms' annual reports and analyzed using panel regression estimates. Findings indicate that agency monitoring costs significantly enhance financial performance in financial firms, while their impact on non-financial firms is minimal. These results align with agency theory, which stresses the necessity of stringent oversight to mitigate managerial opportunism. The study underscores the sectorial differences in agency monitoring effectiveness and recommends that financial institutions prioritize monitoring expenses to improve governance and performance by strategically investing in efficient oversight mechanisms that align managerial actions with shareholder interests. These insights contribute to corporate governance literature and provide practical guidance for firms seeking to balance monitoring costs with financial efficiency.

FUDMA Journal of Accounting and Finance Research [FUJAFR]Vol. 3(1)
Benue State University (NG), University of Mkar (NG), Federal University Dutsin-Ma
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.