Problems of Theatrical and Cinematographic Reception of Demons by Fyodor Dostoevsky

The theatrical and cinematic fate of the novel Demons is largely determined by the historical context in which the work on a particular play or film about it was carried out. This article examines the key events in the novel’s non-literary life, as well as presents the critical reception of contemporaries who often engage in polemics. Among other things, it attempts to understand what makes a theatrical or cinematic adaptation of Dostoevsky’s novel artistically successful or not. Starting with the first theatrical production of Demons in 1907, the review ends with the performance of the St. Petersburg theatre “Masterskaya” staged in the bicentenary of the writer’s birth. The interest of directors in Dostoevsky’s novel increased in the decisive historical periods. One of the most successful productions of Demons in the 1990s was Lev Dodin’s play at the Theatre of Europe (MDT). Demons has also been successful in new forms of theatre, such as immersive theatre. The review also includes the foreign creative reception of the novel. Demons is of interest both to the directors of the French “new wave,” who use Dostoevsky’s novel in their sharply political works, and to authors such as the Polish director Andrzej Wajda, who try to understand their own national identity through the prism of Russian literature. It is also possible to identify two directorial approaches to the novel: some authors try to divide the Demons into separate components (conditionally “romantic” and “political”), while others try to embrace Dostoevsky’s text in its entirety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dostoevsky and World Culture Philological journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2025-1-290-318
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problems of Theatrical and Cinematographic Reception of Demons by Fyodor Dostoevsky

Andrei O. Nasedkin
Dostoevsky and World Culture Philological journal
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Problems of Theatrical and Cinematographic Reception of Demons by Fyodor Dostoevsky

Andrei O. Nasedkin
article en

Abstract

The theatrical and cinematic fate of the novel Demons is largely determined by the historical context in which the work on a particular play or film about it was carried out. This article examines the key events in the novel’s non-literary life, as well as presents the critical reception of contemporaries who often engage in polemics. Among other things, it attempts to understand what makes a theatrical or cinematic adaptation of Dostoevsky’s novel artistically successful or not. Starting with the first theatrical production of Demons in 1907, the review ends with the performance of the St. Petersburg theatre “Masterskaya” staged in the bicentenary of the writer’s birth. The interest of directors in Dostoevsky’s novel increased in the decisive historical periods. One of the most successful productions of Demons in the 1990s was Lev Dodin’s play at the Theatre of Europe (MDT). Demons has also been successful in new forms of theatre, such as immersive theatre. The review also includes the foreign creative reception of the novel. Demons is of interest both to the directors of the French “new wave,” who use Dostoevsky’s novel in their sharply political works, and to authors such as the Polish director Andrzej Wajda, who try to understand their own national identity through the prism of Russian literature. It is also possible to identify two directorial approaches to the novel: some authors try to divide the Demons into separate components (conditionally “romantic” and “political”), while others try to embrace Dostoevsky’s text in its entirety.

Dostoevsky and World Culture Philological journal(1 (29))
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.