A Numerical Study on the Seismic Vulnerability of RC Shear Walls With Different Opening Configurations

This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls with various aspect ratios, focusing on the effects of openings for windows and doors on critical structural parameters. Solid slender walls show the lowest maximum load‐bearing capacity (83.5 kN), with substantial reductions of 50.2% and 70.8% due to openings, making them vulnerable to load‐bearing failures. Intermediate walls, with a solid capacity of 229.7 kN, experience smaller capacity reductions (22.8% for windows and 38.2% for doors), indicating adequate performance with reinforcement. Squat walls demonstrate the highest resilience (518.8 kN), with minimal capacity reductions of 17.3% and 24.8% for openings. Ductility is significantly impacted in slender walls, decreasing by over 51%, while intermediate and squat walls maintain better ductility with smaller reductions. Energy dissipation is also compromised in slender walls (4055 kN‐mm), with reductions of up to 77.7%, while intermediate and squat walls perform better, retaining higher dissipation capacities. Secant stiffness declines markedly in slender walls, whereas intermediate and squat walls maintain good stiffness levels. These findings underscore the importance of considering opening configurations in RC shear walls, as they significantly impact the structural performance parameters critical for seismic resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Civil Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/adce/5530780
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Numerical Study on the Seismic Vulnerability of RC Shear Walls With Different Opening Configurations

K. Karthikeyan, S. Ramachandran, Hemanth Kumar Anbu, Kamalesh Kumar Veerasamy et al.
6 citations
Advances in Civil Engineering
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
6.04
article

A Numerical Study on the Seismic Vulnerability of RC Shear Walls With Different Opening Configurations

K. Karthikeyan, S. Ramachandran, Hemanth Kumar Anbu, Kamalesh Kumar Veerasamy, Senthil Kumaran Ganasean
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls with various aspect ratios, focusing on the effects of openings for windows and doors on critical structural parameters. Solid slender walls show the lowest maximum load‐bearing capacity (83.5 kN), with substantial reductions of 50.2% and 70.8% due to openings, making them vulnerable to load‐bearing failures. Intermediate walls, with a solid capacity of 229.7 kN, experience smaller capacity reductions (22.8% for windows and 38.2% for doors), indicating adequate performance with reinforcement. Squat walls demonstrate the highest resilience (518.8 kN), with minimal capacity reductions of 17.3% and 24.8% for openings. Ductility is significantly impacted in slender walls, decreasing by over 51%, while intermediate and squat walls maintain better ductility with smaller reductions. Energy dissipation is also compromised in slender walls (4055 kN‐mm), with reductions of up to 77.7%, while intermediate and squat walls perform better, retaining higher dissipation capacities. Secant stiffness declines markedly in slender walls, whereas intermediate and squat walls maintain good stiffness levels. These findings underscore the importance of considering opening configurations in RC shear walls, as they significantly impact the structural performance parameters critical for seismic resilience.

Advances in Civil EngineeringVol. 2025(1)
Copperbelt University (ZM), Larsen & Toubro (India) (IN), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
VIT University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.