Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers

Under the Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA's) - Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) "maximum fair price" must be informed by evidence on factors such as therapeutic advance of the selected drug compared with its alternative, comparative effectiveness across clinical and patient-reported outcomes, the impact on specific populations, and the ability to address unmet medical needs. This paper describes how real-world evidence could improve CMS decision-making and creates a best practices checklist to help CMS evaluate the quality of any manufacturer-submitted evidence. The checklist was developed in four steps: (i) identification of the IRA requirements for determining the maximum fair price through a review of official guidance from CMS, (ii) assessment of provisions that could be supported by real-world evidence (RWE) in addition to clinical trial evidence, (iii) literature review on existing best-practice guidelines relevant to RWE, and (iv) consolidation of these RWE guidelines into a checklist through a series of web conference discussions among experts. The checklist aims to improve the quality of the information available to CMS during the drug price negotiation process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers

Kyi‐Sin Than, Jason T. Shafrin, Richard Willke, Melanie D. Whittington et al.
1 citations
Health Affairs Scholar
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
article

Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers

Kyi‐Sin Than, Jason T. Shafrin, Richard Willke, Melanie D. Whittington, Murtuza Bharmal, Sean R. Tunis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Under the Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA's) - Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) "maximum fair price" must be informed by evidence on factors such as therapeutic advance of the selected drug compared with its alternative, comparative effectiveness across clinical and patient-reported outcomes, the impact on specific populations, and the ability to address unmet medical needs. This paper describes how real-world evidence could improve CMS decision-making and creates a best practices checklist to help CMS evaluate the quality of any manufacturer-submitted evidence. The checklist was developed in four steps: (i) identification of the IRA requirements for determining the maximum fair price through a review of official guidance from CMS, (ii) assessment of provisions that could be supported by real-world evidence (RWE) in addition to clinical trial evidence, (iii) literature review on existing best-practice guidelines relevant to RWE, and (iv) consolidation of these RWE guidelines into a checklist through a series of web conference discussions among experts. The checklist aims to improve the quality of the information available to CMS during the drug price negotiation process.

Health Affairs ScholarVol. 3(3)
University of Southern California (US), West Virginia University (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
AstraZeneca
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.