Soft costs and EVSE – Knowledge gaps as a barrier to successful projects

There has been a recent push to increase access to electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure. The National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program, part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) has made significant funding available for major charging infrastructure projects along state thruways, and many state and local incentives exist for EV owners to install chargers in their homes. However, deployment of these chargers has not kept up with demand, primarily due to issues in project planning, permitting processes, and unforeseen delays. This paper serves as a review of the current understanding of these and other non-hardware costs in EV charging infrastructure projects (collectively known as “soft costs”). We found that soft costs in EV charging infrastructure projects are not well understood. Specifically, there is little agreement on how soft costs should be categorized and tracked, and less agreement still on best practices for controlling these costs and lowering barriers to infrastructure deployment. A broader review of EV charging infrastructure cost analyses shows that these costs can have significant impacts on project outcomes. EV charging infrastructure projects may be able to examine the success of the solar industry in lowering soft costs, and a similar effort may lower project costs significantly. Further work on standardizing and collecting data on EV charging infrastructure costs is required to begin addressing and controlling these costs. • EVSE project costs lack a consistent framework to discuss their origins and impacts. • EVSE soft costs have received almost no dedicated study up to this point. • Solar panels offer a parallel technology cost reduction example to follow. • Dedicated work is needed to lower EVSE soft cost barriers to successful projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125749
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soft costs and EVSE – Knowledge gaps as a barrier to successful projects

Rajeshwari Desai, Timothy C. Coburn, Mindy Gerdes, Margaret Taylor et al.
1 citations
Applied Energy
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
0.73
article

Soft costs and EVSE – Knowledge gaps as a barrier to successful projects

Rajeshwari Desai, Timothy C. Coburn, Mindy Gerdes, Margaret Taylor, Peter Benoliel, Peng Shi, Stephen Schey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There has been a recent push to increase access to electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure. The National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program, part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) has made significant funding available for major charging infrastructure projects along state thruways, and many state and local incentives exist for EV owners to install chargers in their homes. However, deployment of these chargers has not kept up with demand, primarily due to issues in project planning, permitting processes, and unforeseen delays. This paper serves as a review of the current understanding of these and other non-hardware costs in EV charging infrastructure projects (collectively known as “soft costs”). We found that soft costs in EV charging infrastructure projects are not well understood. Specifically, there is little agreement on how soft costs should be categorized and tracked, and less agreement still on best practices for controlling these costs and lowering barriers to infrastructure deployment. A broader review of EV charging infrastructure cost analyses shows that these costs can have significant impacts on project outcomes. EV charging infrastructure projects may be able to examine the success of the solar industry in lowering soft costs, and a similar effort may lower project costs significantly. Further work on standardizing and collecting data on EV charging infrastructure costs is required to begin addressing and controlling these costs. • EVSE project costs lack a consistent framework to discuss their origins and impacts. • EVSE soft costs have received almost no dedicated study up to this point. • Solar panels offer a parallel technology cost reduction example to follow. • Dedicated work is needed to lower EVSE soft cost barriers to successful projects.

Applied EnergyVol. 389
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Idaho National Laboratory (US), Institute of Process Engineering (CN)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.