Quantifying CO <sub>2</sub> and Non‐CO <sub>2</sub> Contributions to Climate Change Under 1.5°C and 2°C Adaptive Emission Scenarios

Abstract The individual contributions of various human‐induced forcings under scenarios compatible with the Paris Agreement targets are highly uncertain. To quantify this uncertainty, we analyze three types of models with physical parameter perturbed large ensembles under global warming levels of 1.5 and 2.0°C. The scenarios use adaptive CO 2 emissions, while non‐CO 2 emissions are prescribed. The residual emission budgets in the scenarios are measured in terms of CO 2 forcing equivalent (CO 2 ‐fe). Our simulations quantify approximately 0.8 (0.2–1.3 for a 90% confidence interval) and 1.9 (0.9–3.0) TtCO 2 ‐fe for the 1.5 and 2.0°C targets by the end of the 21st century. About 37.5% (73.7%) of the budget for 1.5°C (2.0°C) originates from the CO 2 emission pathways, highlighting the importance of non‐CO 2 forcings. Aerosols dominate the uncertainty in non‐CO 2 contributions to global responses in both temperature and precipitation. Our modeling results underline the need to constrain the response to each climate forcing, particularly aerosol, to build an accurate mitigation and adaptation plan under the pledges of the Paris Agreement. Moreover, we demonstrate robust differences in global and regional temperature and precipitation responses between the higher and lower CO 2 emission scenarios, highlighting the significance of carbon neutrality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth s Future
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ef005580
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying CO 2 and Non‐CO 2 Contributions to Climate Change Under 1.5°C and 2°C Adaptive Emission Scenarios

Sarah Sparrow, Matteo Willeit, Paulo Ceppi, Myles Allen et al.
1 citations
Earth s Future
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
article

Quantifying CO 2 and Non‐CO 2 Contributions to Climate Change Under 1.5°C and 2°C Adaptive Emission Scenarios

Sarah Sparrow, Matteo Willeit, Paulo Ceppi, Myles Allen, Donghyun Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The individual contributions of various human‐induced forcings under scenarios compatible with the Paris Agreement targets are highly uncertain. To quantify this uncertainty, we analyze three types of models with physical parameter perturbed large ensembles under global warming levels of 1.5 and 2.0°C. The scenarios use adaptive CO 2 emissions, while non‐CO 2 emissions are prescribed. The residual emission budgets in the scenarios are measured in terms of CO 2 forcing equivalent (CO 2 ‐fe). Our simulations quantify approximately 0.8 (0.2–1.3 for a 90% confidence interval) and 1.9 (0.9–3.0) TtCO 2 ‐fe for the 1.5 and 2.0°C targets by the end of the 21st century. About 37.5% (73.7%) of the budget for 1.5°C (2.0°C) originates from the CO 2 emission pathways, highlighting the importance of non‐CO 2 forcings. Aerosols dominate the uncertainty in non‐CO 2 contributions to global responses in both temperature and precipitation. Our modeling results underline the need to constrain the response to each climate forcing, particularly aerosol, to build an accurate mitigation and adaptation plan under the pledges of the Paris Agreement. Moreover, we demonstrate robust differences in global and regional temperature and precipitation responses between the higher and lower CO 2 emission scenarios, highlighting the significance of carbon neutrality.

Earth s FutureVol. 13(3)
Leibniz Association (DE), University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
UK Research and Innovation, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.