Tech Won’t Save Us: Climate Crisis, Techno-Optimism, and International Law

This article critiques the narrative that technological innovations can solve the climate crisis. It argues that technology is important for addressing environmental challenges, but on its own it cannot tackle the broader socioeconomic factors contributing to global ecological degradation. The article examines techno-optimism in international (environmental) law, illustrating its persistent focus on technological solutions from early treaties to contemporary policy agreements. By analysing the limitations of technology – particularly electric vehicles and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage – the article reveals how adherence to the techno-optimist narrative leads international law to undervalue the need for structural changes in our socioeconomic system. The article argues for a shift from the techno-optimist narrative to an ecological one, reflecting the urgent need to redefine development beyond economic growth and technological advancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Technology and Humans
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3816
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Space exploration and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tech Won’t Save Us: Climate Crisis, Techno-Optimism, and International Law

Henrique Marcos
3 citations
Law Technology and Humans
Space exploration and regulation
3.46
article

Tech Won’t Save Us: Climate Crisis, Techno-Optimism, and International Law

Henrique Marcos
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article critiques the narrative that technological innovations can solve the climate crisis. It argues that technology is important for addressing environmental challenges, but on its own it cannot tackle the broader socioeconomic factors contributing to global ecological degradation. The article examines techno-optimism in international (environmental) law, illustrating its persistent focus on technological solutions from early treaties to contemporary policy agreements. By analysing the limitations of technology – particularly electric vehicles and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage – the article reveals how adherence to the techno-optimist narrative leads international law to undervalue the need for structural changes in our socioeconomic system. The article argues for a shift from the techno-optimist narrative to an ecological one, reflecting the urgent need to redefine development beyond economic growth and technological advancement.

Law Technology and Humans
Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Space exploration and regulation
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.