A protocol for structured robustness reproductions and replicability assessments

Abstract Robustness reproductions and replicability discussions are on the rise in response to concerns about a potential credibility crisis in economics. This paper proposes a protocol to structure reproducibility and replicability assessments, with a focus on robustness. Starting with a computational reproduction upon data availability, the protocol encourages replicators to pre-specify robustness tests, prior to implementing them. The protocol contains three different reporting tools to streamline the presentation of results. Beyond reproductions, our protocol assesses adherence to the pre-analysis plans in the replicated papers as well as external and construct validity. Our ambition is to put often controversial debates between replicators and replicated authors on a solid basis and contribute to an improved replication culture in economics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Q Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoaf004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A protocol for structured robustness reproductions and replicability assessments

Anna Dreber, Jörg Peters, Julian Rose, Florian Neubauer et al.
1 citations
Q Open
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
2.31
article

A protocol for structured robustness reproductions and replicability assessments

Anna Dreber, Jörg Peters, Julian Rose, Florian Neubauer, Abel Brodeur, Magnus Johannesson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Robustness reproductions and replicability discussions are on the rise in response to concerns about a potential credibility crisis in economics. This paper proposes a protocol to structure reproducibility and replicability assessments, with a focus on robustness. Starting with a computational reproduction upon data availability, the protocol encourages replicators to pre-specify robustness tests, prior to implementing them. The protocol contains three different reporting tools to streamline the presentation of results. Beyond reproductions, our protocol assesses adherence to the pre-analysis plans in the replicated papers as well as external and construct validity. Our ambition is to put often controversial debates between replicators and replicated authors on a solid basis and contribute to an improved replication culture in economics.

Q OpenVol. 5(3)
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Ottawa (CA), Stockholm School of Economics (SE), University of Passau (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Ottawa University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A protocol for structured robustness reproductions and replicability assessments — Anna Dreber, Jörg Peters, et al. · Q Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS